C5 mpg

This is the Forum for all your Citroen Technical Questions, Problems or Advice.

Moderator: RichardW

Post Reply
davo77
Posts: 28
Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
Location: uk,ulceby
My Cars:

C5 mpg

Post by davo77 »

Hello everyone, I have a 04 2.0hdi Lx with 53k which has the trip computer upgrade and cruise control retrofitted. Here goes having reset trip on a recent drive I had covered 343.4 miles and used 26.96 litres having brimmed tank. mpg calculator .Co.Uk says I achieved 57.9mpg, but computer said 48mpg this was mainly done on motorway at 65mph. Are these always innacurate and what do other people achieve, thanks look forward to hearing from you.
citroenxm
Posts: 8061
Joined: 30 Dec 2004, 23:10
Location: Somewhere in North Wales, Anglesey
My Cars: M reg Xm S2 2.1td Auto Exclusive. 269k and rising
L reg XM S1 V6 12v Manual SEi
L 94 XM 2.1 TD auto total resto

2008 Peugeot 207 Sw 1.6 16v hdi. 217k and rising
2010 Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 8v HDi 161k and rising
x 71

Post by citroenxm »

48mpg or 57mpg, id be WELL pleased with either, considering the size of the C5 and shes only eith a 110 or 90bhp... my guess is with those figures shes a 110bhp...

Trip computers always either over read or seriously under read, but are only a rough guide and never accurate!

Paul
Sharing a pug 207 1.6 hdi Sw 16v.
M reg Xm 2.1 td auto exclusive S2 269k and rising
L reg XM V6 12v SEi auto .. Light project

A very sad...
1994 XM 2.1 d auto
davo77
Posts: 28
Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
Location: uk,ulceby
My Cars:

Post by davo77 »

Hi yes it is a 110, well pleased with her,only problem I have had has been rear caliper corrosion. Been in family since 11k.
User avatar
Old-Guy
Posts: 1798
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 12:08
Location: Gloucestershire
My Cars: 2011 Grand C4 Picasso VTR+ 1.6HDi in Kyanos Blue
1995 Xantia Estate SX 1.9TD in Vert Vega "The Green Lady" - now owned by XanTom
1998 Xantia 2.1 VXD Estate in Mauritius Blue - R.I.P. (terminal tin-worm)
x 17

Post by Old-Guy »

Mileage derived via the 'speedometer' (i.e. drive train) must always be inaccurate because the rolling radii of tyres varies according to tyre design, wear, pressure and speed.

The fuel meter is trying to measure accurately the small amounts of fuel actually injected and which vary enormously.

IMHO the only way to do accurate fuel consumption checks is to determine the error of your odometer over several hundred miles of your typical driving from sat nav figures. Then you can correct the milage for brim-to-brim consumption.

I know of a case of an idiot in a Transit who ran out of fuel because the trip computer told him he still had 6 miles worth of diesel in the tank and he was only 3 miles from base!
2011 Grand C4 Picasso VTR+ 1.6HDi in Kyanos Blue
1995 Xantia Estate SX 1.9TD in Vert Vega "The Green Lady" - after 11 years now owned by XanTom
1998 Xantia 2.1 VXD Estate in Mauritius Blue - R.I.P. (terminal tin-worm)
jonathan_dyane
Posts: 229
Joined: 10 May 2004, 23:32
Location:
My Cars:

Re: C5 mpg

Post by jonathan_dyane »

davo77 wrote:Hello everyone, I have a 04 2.0hdi Lx with 53k which has the trip computer upgrade and cruise control retrofitted. Here goes having reset trip on a recent drive I had covered 343.4 miles and used 26.96 litres having brimmed tank. mpg calculator .Co.Uk says I achieved 57.9mpg, but computer said 48mpg this was mainly done on motorway at 65mph. Are these always innacurate and what do other people achieve, thanks look forward to hearing from you.
To work out properly:

Convert litres to gallons by multiplying litres by .22
29.96 x .22 = 6.5912

Divide miles travelled by gallons used
343.4 / 6.5912 = 52.1 mpg.

Difference between my result and car computer are likely to be due to inaccuracy of your odometer and/or the tank not being *quite* brimmed.
Jonathan
1986 Mercedes Benz 190D 2.5
1979 GS 1220 Club Estate awaiting more welding
1952 David Brown 30D awaiting new liners
davo77
Posts: 28
Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
Location: uk,ulceby
My Cars:

Post by davo77 »

Thanks for the reply,thought it was too good to be true,still pleased with 52mpg .
Citroenmad
Posts: 8125
Joined: 04 Dec 2008, 22:08
Location: Northeast
My Cars: 07 Citroen C6 V6 HDi Exclusive - Red
07 Citroen C5 HDi VTR - Red
09 Citroen C3 1.4i VTR - Silver
01 Citroen Saxo 1.1i Forte - Mango Orange
93 Ford Mondeo 2.0i GLX
19 Hyundai i10
x 110

Post by Citroenmad »

In my expereince 110 HDis always under read. Usually mine says 37MPG which is usually 42ish when i work it out at the pumps. Which is what i get on a weekly basis, though my commute is 60 miles motorway and then over an hour in very slow crawling traffic - huge fun! Though on monday it took me 2 hours to crawl into Newcaslte :( which really had a big effect, im now getting about 32 to the gallon :lol:

Ive never had over 50MPG from any 110HDi, we've had three now, best ive had was 47MPG actual, about 43 on the trip computer if i remember rightly. Though i never sit at below 70 on motorways.

However our facelift C5 over reads by around the same amount, 4-5MPG.

They are good to use as a guide, but are rarely accurate.
Chris
07 Citroen C6 V6 HDi Exclusive - Red
07 Citroen C5 HDi VTR - Red
09 Citroen C3 1.4i VTR - Silver
01 Citroen Saxo 1.1i Forte - Mango Orange
.
93 Ford Mondeo 2.0i GLX
19 Hyundai i10
davo77
Posts: 28
Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
Location: uk,ulceby
My Cars:

Post by davo77 »

Thanks for the insight,have been using shell optimax for a few months now seems to make it run smoother, could be why its getting good figures.
User avatar
Joe Pineapples
Posts: 28
Joined: 31 May 2005, 20:22
Location: Falkirk, United Kingdom
My Cars:
Contact:

Post by Joe Pineapples »

My C5 runs around 46mpg, week in week out, on my daily 80 mile commute to work, according to the trip computer.
Strangely, removing my roof rack and bike carrier makes absolutely no difference.
'02 C5 HDi LX
'00 Xsara HDi SX (For Sale)
'97 Xantia Temptation TD (RIP)
'00 Kawasaki ZX6-R
'71 Girlfriend
davo77
Posts: 28
Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
Location: uk,ulceby
My Cars:

Post by davo77 »

I think these citroens computers all must read below a friend has a C4 1.6hdi and his is always about 10mpg less than what he actually gets.
User avatar
Joe Pineapples
Posts: 28
Joined: 31 May 2005, 20:22
Location: Falkirk, United Kingdom
My Cars:
Contact:

Post by Joe Pineapples »

They're not really supposed to be uber-accurate I guess. More of a guide than a gauge.
'02 C5 HDi LX
'00 Xsara HDi SX (For Sale)
'97 Xantia Temptation TD (RIP)
'00 Kawasaki ZX6-R
'71 Girlfriend
KevMayer
Posts: 1051
Joined: 12 Sep 2003, 22:01
Location: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
My Cars:
x 2

Post by KevMayer »

Just read this thread and realised that there is a minor inacuracy.

The figure should be 57.9 mpg because the original figures said 26.96 litres were used and not 29.96 ltrs which is used to get 52.1 mpg.
Cheers, Kev

02 plate C5 2.2 Hdi Exclusive SE (now 170k miles 03/21).

Used to have:- Xantia 1.9 TurboD SX. 1996 Blue & 1998 Silver Activa. + 1992 BX TZD Turbo.
davo77
Posts: 28
Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
Location: uk,ulceby
My Cars:

Post by davo77 »

Thanks for that info thought it was,couldn't see mpgcalculator.Co.uk being wrong,had deffo brimmed tank to filler neck both times!
seisporting
Posts: 62
Joined: 04 Jan 2010, 13:11
Location:
My Cars:

Post by seisporting »

Mine only does 29-30 on trip computer.
Using the mpg website to calculate its more near 37 so seems it is inaccurate.
Post Reply