C5 mpg
-
davo77
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
C5 mpg
Hello everyone, I have a 04 2.0hdi Lx with 53k which has the trip computer upgrade and cruise control retrofitted. Here goes having reset trip on a recent drive I had covered 343.4 miles and used 26.96 litres having brimmed tank. mpg calculator .Co.Uk says I achieved 57.9mpg, but computer said 48mpg this was mainly done on motorway at 65mph. Are these always innacurate and what do other people achieve, thanks look forward to hearing from you.
-
citroenxm
- Fallen Hero
- Posts: 8061
- Joined: 30 Dec 2004, 23:10
- x 70
48mpg or 57mpg, id be WELL pleased with either, considering the size of the C5 and shes only eith a 110 or 90bhp... my guess is with those figures shes a 110bhp...
Trip computers always either over read or seriously under read, but are only a rough guide and never accurate!
Paul
Trip computers always either over read or seriously under read, but are only a rough guide and never accurate!
Paul
Sharing a pug 207 1.6 hdi Sw 16v.
M reg Xm 2.1 td auto exclusive S2 269k and rising
L reg XM V6 12v SEi auto .. Light project
A very sad...
1994 XM 2.1 d auto
M reg Xm 2.1 td auto exclusive S2 269k and rising
L reg XM V6 12v SEi auto .. Light project
A very sad...
1994 XM 2.1 d auto
-
davo77
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
-
Old-Guy
- (Donor 2025)
- Posts: 1822
- Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 12:08
- x 22
Mileage derived via the 'speedometer' (i.e. drive train) must always be inaccurate because the rolling radii of tyres varies according to tyre design, wear, pressure and speed.
The fuel meter is trying to measure accurately the small amounts of fuel actually injected and which vary enormously.
IMHO the only way to do accurate fuel consumption checks is to determine the error of your odometer over several hundred miles of your typical driving from sat nav figures. Then you can correct the milage for brim-to-brim consumption.
I know of a case of an idiot in a Transit who ran out of fuel because the trip computer told him he still had 6 miles worth of diesel in the tank and he was only 3 miles from base!
The fuel meter is trying to measure accurately the small amounts of fuel actually injected and which vary enormously.
IMHO the only way to do accurate fuel consumption checks is to determine the error of your odometer over several hundred miles of your typical driving from sat nav figures. Then you can correct the milage for brim-to-brim consumption.
I know of a case of an idiot in a Transit who ran out of fuel because the trip computer told him he still had 6 miles worth of diesel in the tank and he was only 3 miles from base!
2012 Subaru Forester - capable but no magic carpet
2011 Grand C4 Picasso VTR+ 1.6HDi - not missed!
1995 Xantia Estate SX 1.9TD in Vert Vega "The Green Lady" - sadly missed
1998 Xantia 2.1 VXD Estate in Mauritius Blue - R.I.P. (terminal tin-worm)
2011 Grand C4 Picasso VTR+ 1.6HDi - not missed!
1995 Xantia Estate SX 1.9TD in Vert Vega "The Green Lady" - sadly missed
1998 Xantia 2.1 VXD Estate in Mauritius Blue - R.I.P. (terminal tin-worm)
-
jonathan_dyane
- Posts: 229
- Joined: 10 May 2004, 23:32
Re: C5 mpg
To work out properly:davo77 wrote:Hello everyone, I have a 04 2.0hdi Lx with 53k which has the trip computer upgrade and cruise control retrofitted. Here goes having reset trip on a recent drive I had covered 343.4 miles and used 26.96 litres having brimmed tank. mpg calculator .Co.Uk says I achieved 57.9mpg, but computer said 48mpg this was mainly done on motorway at 65mph. Are these always innacurate and what do other people achieve, thanks look forward to hearing from you.
Convert litres to gallons by multiplying litres by .22
29.96 x .22 = 6.5912
Divide miles travelled by gallons used
343.4 / 6.5912 = 52.1 mpg.
Difference between my result and car computer are likely to be due to inaccuracy of your odometer and/or the tank not being *quite* brimmed.
Jonathan
1986 Mercedes Benz 190D 2.5
1979 GS 1220 Club Estate awaiting more welding
1952 David Brown 30D awaiting new liners
1986 Mercedes Benz 190D 2.5
1979 GS 1220 Club Estate awaiting more welding
1952 David Brown 30D awaiting new liners
-
davo77
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
-
Citroenmad
- Posts: 8125
- Joined: 04 Dec 2008, 22:08
- x 110
In my expereince 110 HDis always under read. Usually mine says 37MPG which is usually 42ish when i work it out at the pumps. Which is what i get on a weekly basis, though my commute is 60 miles motorway and then over an hour in very slow crawling traffic - huge fun! Though on monday it took me 2 hours to crawl into Newcaslte
which really had a big effect, im now getting about 32 to the gallon 
Ive never had over 50MPG from any 110HDi, we've had three now, best ive had was 47MPG actual, about 43 on the trip computer if i remember rightly. Though i never sit at below 70 on motorways.
However our facelift C5 over reads by around the same amount, 4-5MPG.
They are good to use as a guide, but are rarely accurate.
Ive never had over 50MPG from any 110HDi, we've had three now, best ive had was 47MPG actual, about 43 on the trip computer if i remember rightly. Though i never sit at below 70 on motorways.
However our facelift C5 over reads by around the same amount, 4-5MPG.
They are good to use as a guide, but are rarely accurate.
Chris
15 Citroen C4 Cactus HDi Feel - Red
14 Citroen C3 Picasso HDi Selection - Grey
07 Citroen C6 V6 HDi Exclusive - Red
01 Citroen Saxo 1.1i Forte - Mango
.
24 Toyota Yaris Hybrid
12 Ford Mondeo TDCi Business Edition
03 Seat Arosa 1.0S
15 Citroen C4 Cactus HDi Feel - Red
14 Citroen C3 Picasso HDi Selection - Grey
07 Citroen C6 V6 HDi Exclusive - Red
01 Citroen Saxo 1.1i Forte - Mango
.
24 Toyota Yaris Hybrid
12 Ford Mondeo TDCi Business Edition
03 Seat Arosa 1.0S
-
davo77
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
-
Joe Pineapples
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 31 May 2005, 20:22
My C5 runs around 46mpg, week in week out, on my daily 80 mile commute to work, according to the trip computer.
Strangely, removing my roof rack and bike carrier makes absolutely no difference.
Strangely, removing my roof rack and bike carrier makes absolutely no difference.
'02 C5 HDi LX
'00 Xsara HDi SX (For Sale)
'97 Xantia Temptation TD (RIP)
'00 Kawasaki ZX6-R
'71 Girlfriend
'00 Xsara HDi SX (For Sale)
'97 Xantia Temptation TD (RIP)
'00 Kawasaki ZX6-R
'71 Girlfriend
-
davo77
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
-
Joe Pineapples
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 31 May 2005, 20:22
-
KevMayer
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: 12 Sep 2003, 22:01
- x 2
Just read this thread and realised that there is a minor inacuracy.
The figure should be 57.9 mpg because the original figures said 26.96 litres were used and not 29.96 ltrs which is used to get 52.1 mpg.
The figure should be 57.9 mpg because the original figures said 26.96 litres were used and not 29.96 ltrs which is used to get 52.1 mpg.
Cheers, Kev
02 plate C5 2.2 Hdi Exclusive SE (now 170k miles 03/21).
Used to have:- Xantia 1.9 TurboD SX. 1996 Blue & 1998 Silver Activa. + 1992 BX TZD Turbo.
02 plate C5 2.2 Hdi Exclusive SE (now 170k miles 03/21).
Used to have:- Xantia 1.9 TurboD SX. 1996 Blue & 1998 Silver Activa. + 1992 BX TZD Turbo.
-
davo77
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 28 Jan 2010, 08:26
-
seisporting
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 04 Jan 2010, 13:11