Detuning 2.0 16V

This is the Forum for all your Citroen Technical Questions, Problems or Advice.

Moderator: RichardW

Post Reply
dnsey
Posts: 1538
Joined: 20 Oct 2004, 01:39
Location:
My Cars:
x 19

Detuning 2.0 16V

Post by dnsey »

Whilst the 16v 2.0 Xantia returns respectable fuel consumption on longer journeys, my wife is finding it thirsty for her relatively short trips.
I know that there are specialists offering tweaks to the ECU software to improve performance, but does anyone kow of any modifications (software or hardware) to improve fuel consumption at the expense of performance?

Thanks in advance for any replies - the site is running fine tonight, but I'll probably have to wait a few days until it's good again to read follow-ups :(
User avatar
Mandrake
Posts: 8618
Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 17:23
Location: North Lanarkshire, UK
My Cars:
x 666

Post by Mandrake »

What about a brick under the accelerator pedal ?

Seriously. :lol:

The only thing you could do to ECU programing to improve fuel economy would be to limit the maximum fueling - otherwise known as not pressing the accelerator all the way to the floor :twisted:

Regards,
Simon
Simon

1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White

2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
1978 CX 2400
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
Stempy
Posts: 1626
Joined: 26 Feb 2004, 23:21
Location: Cloud Cuckooland
My Cars: C5 V6 Mk1 assainated by wife
Renault Kangoo 1.6 auto, tarted up and remapped
Still missing the Xantia V6
Not missing the AX
Contact:

Post by Stempy »

I remember in the motorbike world they used to restrict bikes by fitting a disc with a hole in it somewhere along the intake tract so as to limit the maximum amount of airflow, might be worth a try.
It infuriates me to be wrong when I know I'm right

Lexia ponce

http://perception.dyndns.biz/~avengineering/index.htm
User avatar
CitroJim
A very naughty boy
Posts: 49658
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 23:33
Location: Paggers
My Cars: Bluebell the AX, Polly the C3 Picasso, Pix the Nissan Pixo, Propel the duathlon bike, TCR Pro the road bike and Fuji the TT bike...
x 6204
Contact:

Post by CitroJim »

Simon is quite right :)

Generally, the turning for performance (within limits obviously) is precisely the same as tuning for economy; the two go hand-in-hand. The goal in both instances being to make the engine run as efficiently as possible for a given amount of fuel. So, if you have a well tuned engine and use it gently it'll be economical. It just takes restraint and cultivating a feather foot on the accelerator and learning the techniques of driving for economy.

Unfortunately, there is no magic ECU tweak that will improve economy drastically.

In the final analysis, good maintenance of the engine and drive-train, ensuring the brakes are not binding, tyre pressures, tracking and not carrying excess weight around make a far bigger difference to economy than any ECU tweaking might.

Try Shell V Power petrol or similar. More expensive I know but the higher octane allows the engine to run with more ignition advance before the knock sensor activates and thus more efficiently. It makes a noticable difference in my Activa.
Jim

Runner, cyclist, time triallist, duathlete, Citroen AX fan and the CCC Citroenian 'From A to Z' Columnist...
jeremy
Posts: 3959
Joined: 20 Oct 2002, 16:00
Location: Hampshire, UK
My Cars:
x 2

Post by jeremy »

I expect the throttle cable is the same as that fitted to the diesels - with some rings cut in the plastic outer sleeve at the engine end with adjustment made by a spring clip fitting in a groove.

If so you can prevent the throttle opening fully by moving the clip to another (slacker) position. Do this enough and the throttle won't open fully.

Generally the best economy is achieved with a properly tuned engine (ie developing full power) which is driven gently. The mixture will richen on acceleration from say 15:1 to 12:1 - so a low powered engine driven with a wide open throttle to achieve a satisfactory cruising speed will be tending to run at 12:1 rather than 15:1 as the more powerful engine gets into its stride.
jeremy
Bootser
Posts: 17
Joined: 28 Jul 2006, 22:09
Location: salisbury
My Cars:

Post by Bootser »

citrojim wrote:Try Shell V Power petrol or similar. More expensive I know but the higher octane allows the engine to run with more ignition advance before the knock sensor activates and thus more efficiently. It makes a noticable difference in my Activa.
I agree , i use V Power in my activa , it does make a difference .
User avatar
oscarloco
Posts: 369
Joined: 24 Nov 2003, 23:02
Location: Guatemala
My Cars:
x 2

Post by oscarloco »

Bootser wrote:
citrojim wrote:Try Shell V Power petrol or similar. More expensive I know but the higher octane allows the engine to run with more ignition advance before the knock sensor activates and thus more efficiently. It makes a noticable difference in my Activa.
I agree , i use V Power in my activa , it does make a difference .
On my ZX, V Power actually rised the fuel consumption. But then again, ECU is an Magnetti Marelli 8P.
Oscar Lopez
'94 ZX 2.0 8v petrol (restoration to its former glory on its way after being neglected by stupid Ex)
NiSk
Posts: 1422
Joined: 24 Jan 2002, 20:11
Location: Sweden
My Cars:
x 1

Post by NiSk »

Try taking the lead weights out of the wife's driving shoes . . .

//NiSk
'85 BX 16TRS, '91 XM injection 241,000 km (company car), '93 XM TD12 (515,000 km), '98 XM 2.5TD Break (320,000 km)
Post Reply