Skull wrote: 10 Dec 2025, 15:15 I've gone back a couple of pages ....
It's now apparant that the 'piece' you can see in the above image is the Valve recess on the pistonSkull wrote: 08 Dec 2025, 13:12 Well the results of my inspection today ....it's fair to say that it needs more than a Cam-Follower![]()
I can't tell from the camera orientation as it just gives a peep-hole view (edit: photos with fuel injector removed and camera inserted through the hole)
That looks like the final chapter @ 168K
I'm not sure whether this is a piece of the missing piston or the valve seemingly sat on a ledge or perhaps a piece held by the valve.
![]()
![]()
I went back in between today's rain and had another look, I lowered the pistons for a better view and I can now see that the hole/puddle is at the front of the piston .... the engine is canted backwards so if it was a puddle it would be at the rear of the piston (right side of first photo below), the valve recess is more to the front on these engines so I'm still inclined [sic] to think it's a hole ....
This one shows the mirror that fell off the endoscope![]()
I've carried on and taken out the Bearing Cap for the Camshaft and Followers and noted a chink in the Camshaft - will that be a DIY job to minimise![]()
I note Rothgar's idea to try and re-test compression now that the Camshaft is removed, so all Valves should now be closed but also note his caution that this will also lose it's compression stroke position for any rebuild that might happen in the future, I haven't measured any valve spring height yet but I'm inclined to think it's decision time on 'head off' or 'new follower on and fingers crossed' .....
I wouldn't be in the slightest bit embarrassed about the 'shard' being the valve recess. It shows simply that you should never assume.
As for the puddle, maybe you are thinking your camera is rotated 180 degrees out when it isn't or vice versa. It might even show a reversed image especially it is using mirrors...
Personally I think you are wrong and you are assuming again. Think about it! Surely the valves sit near to the rear because the inlet and outlet manifolds are on that side so therefore the puddle is at the back? Be interesting to find out.
Something has thwacked that camlobe and it's possibly a now bent valve but we cannot say for sure at present. Time will tell.
Personally I wouldn't be worried about the chink as you can see either side is fine. If it was mine and I was having to go a head gasket then would I be bothered about it? Wouldn't I? I'm not sure. It would irritate me I guess.
Stickyfinger made a good point about the amount of valve bend. He's probably right or it's a very badly burned seat and we shall never know unless it is stripped.
The decision, as they say, is yours.