aerodynamica wrote: 28 Jan 2023, 17:50
bobins wrote: 28 Jan 2023, 17:25
Steering Rack Aficionados - ASSEMBLE !
Righty-ho. Have a close look at the pipe end in the pictures. The 'O'-ring is intact, the bit of pipe that actually goes into the pinion shaft housing is in perfect condition. It's only the bit that's external to the shaft housing and that doesn't come into contact with LDS / Fluide DA that's damaged. So why does it leak ? I've mentioned before, and I'm still of the opinion that the swaged part of the pipe is there to make a fluid seal against the pinion housing and that's why these pipes can only really be considered single use - when they're tightened down onto their mating face the swaged bit crushes against the pinion housing mating face.
It might be possible to bodge/provide another sealing face for the pipe by cutting a tiddly litle washer out of, say, a Coke can and using that to sit between the pinion housing mating face and the swaged part of the pipe.
Y'know, you might be right. I question why it's made from alloy in the first place but that would be the ideal material for forming against the pinion valve machined face.
In almost all instances it is because it's the cheapest thing that'll do the job satisfactorily

I can't at present think why steel wouldn't do - but would guess it's the tube needing to be formed into the swage/flange that swings it towards aluminium.
I'm not sure, or else I don't understand, why if the soft aluminium pipe flange deforming to the face of the rack connection was to form the sealing function, why bother adding an O-ring groove?
Galvanic corrosion seems to be what is going on - needs three things to occur:
Two dissimilar metals with greater than 0.57?? Volts between them (determined from the materials in question, galvanic series) e.g steel clamp and aluminium pipe.
Electrically connection between the two e.g. bolted together in this case.
And an electrolyte. E.g. salty water thrown up from the road.
Thank you for the picture, looks a simple enough form to recreate, I'm more in favour of leaving the rack connection as designed and creating a way of a new pipe connection after that (i.e. a rack connection to JIC4 adapter as I pondered earlier)
P.s. are we "Aficionados" or just "steering rack afflicted"
