One for the boffins...
S1 405 with working fuel sender, continuity to dash connector plug.
From the four pin Veglia fuel gauge it has a little "piggyback" board with one side basic caps and other common bits, and the other all SMDs. Foolishly, I forgot to photograph these pieces when the dash was apart.
Gauge when stripped of this board, deflects to about halfway with an independent feed of 1.5V. I'm guessing that's fairly normal. Grounding out the low fuel switched feed with ignition on, doesn't light the low fuel light.
My presumption is the gauge receives a stabilised feed with less than 12V to full deflection, and there is some sort of latch for the low fuel lamp, like on Xantias. Seem realistic for 1990 technology?
I'm not the greatest when it comes to circuit diagnostics of this sort. To get no result - not even a tickle - suggests complete failure of some key aspect.
Has anyone here tinkered with this type of stuff? I'm interested in pointers to follow with a troubleshooting regime.
Cheers, Adam.
(This is the trouble with blue-collar careers - your mind runs riot on the hobbies...)
Fuel Gauge Driver Board
-
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 15:28
- x 77
I'll try to figure it out from some circuit diagrams (read: rats nest) as I have these for S1 in a tatty BOL.
I though the low fuel light was not actually fed from the gauge signal, I seem to recall it has a separate switch (built into the sender) , but I could be totally wrong here and possibly thinking of another make.
I though the low fuel light was not actually fed from the gauge signal, I seem to recall it has a separate switch (built into the sender) , but I could be totally wrong here and possibly thinking of another make.
Andy.
91 205D-Turbo, gone but still missed
02 106D, TUD5B, gone but not really missed apart from the MPG
91 205D-Turbo, gone but still missed
02 106D, TUD5B, gone but not really missed apart from the MPG
-
- Sara Watson's Stalker
- Posts: 7098
- Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 12:38
- x 94
-
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 15:28
- x 77
-
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 15:28
- x 77
Looking at the diagram (well, a kind of diagram) , I see what you mean.
There's nothing to show the internals of the instrument panel.
However, the fuel sender has three connections, both with a common feed (or earth, I guess feed), the two outputs:
One is a switch (so simple on / off) this will obviously be the low fuel level sensor / float
The other is a potentiometer, obviously the sender.
Not sure if that's any help though. Should be three wires from the sender by the looks of it...
EDIT... Just re-read your post again, although the PSA senders are usually reliable. I do recall on one of my MK3 escorts (a long time ago) the sender failed on that, anything less than 1/3 tank always read zero, it was strange as you would suddenly see it just fall off the scale. It was accurate above that. Perhaps you have a similar issue.
Replacement sender (if possible) would be ideal, although you say you have a S1+ so I guess you have a K plate (?) as that could be mix...
There's nothing to show the internals of the instrument panel.
However, the fuel sender has three connections, both with a common feed (or earth, I guess feed), the two outputs:
One is a switch (so simple on / off) this will obviously be the low fuel level sensor / float
The other is a potentiometer, obviously the sender.
Not sure if that's any help though. Should be three wires from the sender by the looks of it...
EDIT... Just re-read your post again, although the PSA senders are usually reliable. I do recall on one of my MK3 escorts (a long time ago) the sender failed on that, anything less than 1/3 tank always read zero, it was strange as you would suddenly see it just fall off the scale. It was accurate above that. Perhaps you have a similar issue.
Replacement sender (if possible) would be ideal, although you say you have a S1+ so I guess you have a K plate (?) as that could be mix...
Andy.
91 205D-Turbo, gone but still missed
02 106D, TUD5B, gone but not really missed apart from the MPG
91 205D-Turbo, gone but still missed
02 106D, TUD5B, gone but not really missed apart from the MPG
-
- Sara Watson's Stalker
- Posts: 7098
- Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 12:38
- x 94
Hi Andy, sounds like exactly the same circuit diagrams as I ran into! By UK registration standards, the car would be a very early H-plate.
I've been through the sender; replaced the wiper arm as the old unit was worn to a stump after 195K miles. With the mouldymeter I now get imperfect yet usable "steps" in resistance as the float arm moves.
The piggyback board looks like a way to deal with the later two-wire sender; it stabilises the jiggling output and once damped voltage increases (and remains) beyond a certain point it powers on the low fuel light.
If I used a low mileage Xantia resistive track (about 280 ohms instead of the 405's 200 ohm one) I might be able to use the matching dash gauge. The lower "pot" of many fuel pickup/sender units is interchangeable with only the upper portion defining the model - smart design.
I've got to reef out the dash in a few weeks, so will probably have a red-hot go again, at that time. Rehooking the speedo cable (dash end) on these is a challenge...
As an aside (possibly for the tech archives) the tank/sender seals in these cars have a bifurcated lower lip. I see this as meaning you install the seal into the tank, then slide the sender unit through. Also I clean thoroughly the lock ring threads and lock ring, then lightly grease with waterproof grease - makes tightening the lock ring to its match marks, very easy.
I've been through the sender; replaced the wiper arm as the old unit was worn to a stump after 195K miles. With the mouldymeter I now get imperfect yet usable "steps" in resistance as the float arm moves.
The piggyback board looks like a way to deal with the later two-wire sender; it stabilises the jiggling output and once damped voltage increases (and remains) beyond a certain point it powers on the low fuel light.
If I used a low mileage Xantia resistive track (about 280 ohms instead of the 405's 200 ohm one) I might be able to use the matching dash gauge. The lower "pot" of many fuel pickup/sender units is interchangeable with only the upper portion defining the model - smart design.
I've got to reef out the dash in a few weeks, so will probably have a red-hot go again, at that time. Rehooking the speedo cable (dash end) on these is a challenge...
As an aside (possibly for the tech archives) the tank/sender seals in these cars have a bifurcated lower lip. I see this as meaning you install the seal into the tank, then slide the sender unit through. Also I clean thoroughly the lock ring threads and lock ring, then lightly grease with waterproof grease - makes tightening the lock ring to its match marks, very easy.
-
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 15:28
- x 77
Ah, yes I have heard about the speedo cable (but never done one)
To be fair I think with yours having the earlier dash it will be easier. The later ones, the trick was to use an elastic band (apparently) to hold it in place so when it pushed home it locked (the band broke and sat harmlessly in the dash anyway.
The tracks have probably worn away on the sender then by the sounds of it, similar effect to the heater fan speed knob (where they wear into 'steps' rather than being linear) , I know as my 205 did this and its 'fun' to replace.
It should be reasonably smooth in operation (resistance wise) throughout its range.
Your theory on the extra board could well be correct. I guess these only come with the panel (and just a few at a guess)
Although again off topic, I do sympathise when you get these 'in-between' vehicles, I had one of the very very last MK2 Astra's once and nothing (brake wise) from the dealer would fit. I'll spare you the details but it was basically built up in the factory using Corsa braking parts.
Back on topic, I'd say see if the scrappy has any early panels and have a peek.
If possible I'd love to see a pic or two of said 'extra' board.
To be fair I think with yours having the earlier dash it will be easier. The later ones, the trick was to use an elastic band (apparently) to hold it in place so when it pushed home it locked (the band broke and sat harmlessly in the dash anyway.
The tracks have probably worn away on the sender then by the sounds of it, similar effect to the heater fan speed knob (where they wear into 'steps' rather than being linear) , I know as my 205 did this and its 'fun' to replace.
It should be reasonably smooth in operation (resistance wise) throughout its range.
Your theory on the extra board could well be correct. I guess these only come with the panel (and just a few at a guess)
Although again off topic, I do sympathise when you get these 'in-between' vehicles, I had one of the very very last MK2 Astra's once and nothing (brake wise) from the dealer would fit. I'll spare you the details but it was basically built up in the factory using Corsa braking parts.
Back on topic, I'd say see if the scrappy has any early panels and have a peek.
If possible I'd love to see a pic or two of said 'extra' board.
Andy.
91 205D-Turbo, gone but still missed
02 106D, TUD5B, gone but not really missed apart from the MPG
91 205D-Turbo, gone but still missed
02 106D, TUD5B, gone but not really missed apart from the MPG
-
- Posts: 8061
- Joined: 31 Dec 2004, 00:10
- x 71
Not sure if Ive read this topic correctly...
Faulty Guage? I had a Xantia Estate in with ths problem...It was a 1997 P plater, petrol
Replaced sender in tank with a known good one... still the same. Continuty check, all checked out fine...
Swapped the guage still the same... scratched the head... So followed the tracks on the instrumen, and found a piggy back board that the wireing from the sender goes through...
Swapped the instrument panel to another ALL worked well!!!
So the small piggyback board can go wrong, but not looked to see exactly what it does...
Paul
Faulty Guage? I had a Xantia Estate in with ths problem...It was a 1997 P plater, petrol
Replaced sender in tank with a known good one... still the same. Continuty check, all checked out fine...
Swapped the guage still the same... scratched the head... So followed the tracks on the instrumen, and found a piggy back board that the wireing from the sender goes through...
Swapped the instrument panel to another ALL worked well!!!
So the small piggyback board can go wrong, but not looked to see exactly what it does...
Paul
Last edited by citroenxm on 05 Oct 2010, 18:24, edited 1 time in total.
Sharing a pug 207 1.6 hdi Sw 16v.
M reg Xm 2.1 td auto exclusive S2 269k and rising
L reg XM V6 12v SEi auto .. Light project
A very sad...
1994 XM 2.1 d auto
M reg Xm 2.1 td auto exclusive S2 269k and rising
L reg XM V6 12v SEi auto .. Light project
A very sad...
1994 XM 2.1 d auto
-
- Sara Watson's Stalker
- Posts: 7098
- Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 12:38
- x 94
-
- Sara Watson's Stalker
- Posts: 7098
- Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 12:38
- x 94
Interesting observation:
The Handbrake warning light draws ground from a source shared with the fuel sender. With a quarter tank, even when brakes released the warning light remained dimly lit - clearly there was a ground being "pulled" backwards through the sender.
Filling the tank extinguished the handbrake lamp - obviously due to the higher inline resistance of the sender.
That suggests on the driver board, a solid state component has failed, allowing reverse current flow. Diode, probably.
The Handbrake warning light draws ground from a source shared with the fuel sender. With a quarter tank, even when brakes released the warning light remained dimly lit - clearly there was a ground being "pulled" backwards through the sender.
Filling the tank extinguished the handbrake lamp - obviously due to the higher inline resistance of the sender.
That suggests on the driver board, a solid state component has failed, allowing reverse current flow. Diode, probably.