Eolys Rip Off
Moderator: RichardW
-
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 07:24
- Location: West Sussex U.K
- My Cars:
- x 9
Eolys Rip Off
During a Lexia session I discovered a new Diagnostic Message :-
Additive System Low Level Sensor fault Permanent. A check on the parameter pages said that additive low level had not been reached. Havn't yet reached firm conclusion about this apparent contradiction but anyway decided that if I was going to "attack" elements of the Eolys tank it would be a good idea to get some Eolys in.
Now we all know that Citroen charge a lot of money and logic said that there should be alternative sources which would be cheaper, so started the investigation.
After some considerable time on the web the only alternative source I could find was GSF. When I asked GSF for a price it was within a few quid of the CItroen further inquiries elicited the information that GSF get it from Citroen as being the only supplier, the belief is that TOTAL will only supply Citroen. If that is the case it explains the high price and I believe is also against ECC competition rules.
Now like most people I don't like being screwed over but this does leave me with a dilemma.
I agree in principal with the FAP system even though I know that it reduces performance and increases consumption a little I can accept this but I don't feel inclined to accept this and be screwed over at the same time so the question is is it time for the FAP to go ?
cachaciero
Additive System Low Level Sensor fault Permanent. A check on the parameter pages said that additive low level had not been reached. Havn't yet reached firm conclusion about this apparent contradiction but anyway decided that if I was going to "attack" elements of the Eolys tank it would be a good idea to get some Eolys in.
Now we all know that Citroen charge a lot of money and logic said that there should be alternative sources which would be cheaper, so started the investigation.
After some considerable time on the web the only alternative source I could find was GSF. When I asked GSF for a price it was within a few quid of the CItroen further inquiries elicited the information that GSF get it from Citroen as being the only supplier, the belief is that TOTAL will only supply Citroen. If that is the case it explains the high price and I believe is also against ECC competition rules.
Now like most people I don't like being screwed over but this does leave me with a dilemma.
I agree in principal with the FAP system even though I know that it reduces performance and increases consumption a little I can accept this but I don't feel inclined to accept this and be screwed over at the same time so the question is is it time for the FAP to go ?
cachaciero
2006 Toyota Prius T Spirit
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
-
- (Donor 2022)
- Posts: 2632
- Joined: 14 Mar 2001, 23:41
- Location: Epsom, Surrey
- My Cars: 2010 Citroen C5-X7 tourer
1998 Citroen Saxo 1.5D
2018 Citroen C4-B7
1998 Peugeot 306. 1.9D
2011 Citroen C1 - x 72
- Contact:
Re: Eolys Rip Off
Eolys was developed and is produced by Rhone-Poulenc or Rhodia as I believe they call themselves now. All pharmaceutical companies have copyright on any new product they bring to market for a period of ten years. Thereafter other companies can get in on the act. The fact that the formulation of Eolys was changed around 2003/4 probably means the start of a new ten year copyright period.cachaciero wrote:
After some considerable time on the web the only alternative source I could find was GSF. When I asked GSF for a price it was within a few quid of the Citroën further inquiries elicited the information that GSF get it from Citroën as being the only supplier, the belief is that TOTAL will only supply Citroën. If that is the case it explains the high price and I believe is also against ECC competition rules.
2010 C5 X7 VTR+Nav 160
1998 1.5 Saxo
1998 Pug 306 1.9D
2018 C4 B7 VTR+
2011 Citroen C1
1998 1.5 Saxo
1998 Pug 306 1.9D
2018 C4 B7 VTR+
2011 Citroen C1
-
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 07:24
- Location: West Sussex U.K
- My Cars:
- x 9
Well having read up on the low level sensor which is part of the pump which is part of the tank and inseperable then if it really is U/S then the FAP system will have to go as I don't intend buying a complete new tank for a tuppeny halfpenny sensor! Mind I can think of possible repair schemes if I only knew what the value of the thermistor sensor was.
cachaciero
cachaciero
2006 Toyota Prius T Spirit
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
- Paul-R
- Donor 2023
- Posts: 6935
- Joined: 07 May 2009, 16:24
- Location: Wirral, NW England; Vaucluse 84, France
- Lexia Available: Yes
- My Cars: 2015 1.6 Blue HDi 120 Peugeot 308 Active SW
2013 2.0 HDi 163 C5 Exclusive Tourer
2003 2.0 HDi 110 C5 Exclusive Estate (Gone)
2001 2.0 HDi 90 Xsara Estate (Gone) - x 1379
My thoughts exactly concerning the outside air temperature sensor in the LH door mirror!cachaciero wrote:Mind I can think of possible repair schemes if I only knew what the value of the thermistor sensor was.
Anyway, back to the subject. Yes, I agree that it might be time to wave goodbye to the FAP. Ever since I came across a page in the Lexia readings of my C5 which gave all sort of options for the standing still FAP burn and then had an option for the FAP to be present, or not, I've considered that the job was eminently "do-able".
You might be the first one to take the plunge though.
As I get older I think a lot about the hereafter - I go into a room and then wonder what I'm here after.
Inside every old person is a young person wondering what the hell happened.
"Trying is the first step towards failure" ~ Homer J Simpson
Inside every old person is a young person wondering what the hell happened.
"Trying is the first step towards failure" ~ Homer J Simpson
-
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 07:24
- Location: West Sussex U.K
- My Cars:
- x 9
No I won't be the first I have read in other fori of others that have done it. There are "several "system Approaches" to removing it but the one thing I would like to be able to do if possible is to remove the ceramic element complete because as I said I do think that the use of a FAP is an environmentally friendly thing to do and if in the future it should be that the required bits from a broken 2004 on car became available I might want to re-instate it.Paul-R wrote: You might be the first one to take the plunge though.
cachaciero
2006 Toyota Prius T Spirit
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: 15 Oct 2005, 16:44
- Location: Cumbria, CA21
- My Cars: '05 C4 2.0HDI Exclusive
'07 Lexus RX400h
Past:
'73 GS 1220 Club Estate (a good intro to hydraulics and rust)
'74 DS D Super 5 (Superb comfort and even more rust)
'?? Dyane (fun + rust)
'?? CX 2400 GTI (served me well)
'89 CX Safari 2.5 DTR turbo (aka "the hearse" an excellent family load lugger)
'97 XM 2.1TD (Reliable and economical) - x 2
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: 26 Aug 2010, 21:16
- Location: sunny south, Poole Dorset
- My Cars:
- x 1
Hi have you seen this on ebay it might help ?
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/EOLYS-176-PEUGEOT ... 3cb08c7096
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/EOLYS-176-PEUGEOT ... 3cb08c7096
-
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 07:24
- Location: West Sussex U.K
- My Cars:
- x 9
imperial21 wrote:Hi have you seen this on ebay it might help ?
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/EOLYS-176-PEUGEOT ... 3cb08c7096
Unfortunately that is DPX176 which is for the later 2004 on C5.
cachaciero
2006 Toyota Prius T Spirit
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
-
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 07:24
- Location: West Sussex U.K
- My Cars:
- x 9
Re: Eolys Rip Off
That's an interesting dimension to the story but as I understand it Eolys is a mixture of cerium oxide Iron oxide in a Parafin base the only thing which I can see that would be possibly patentable is the exact formulation. I can't see that it would be that difficult for somebody else to make the same thing with a slight variation and be outside any patent.JohnD wrote:cachaciero wrote:
Eolys was developed and is produced by Rhone-Poulenc or Rhodia as I believe they call themselves now. All pharmaceutical companies have copyright on any new product they bring to market for a period of ten years. Thereafter other companies can get in on the act. The fact that the formulation of Eolys was changed around 2003/4 probably means the start of a new ten year copyright period.
In fact as to the "improved" formulation i.e DPX176 it could well be that the only difference is that there is a small increase in the active ingredients and the amount added to the fuel is slightly less which would for the same total quantity of additive give a slightly improved mileage between top ups which in fact is the case.
cachaciero
2006 Toyota Prius T Spirit
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
-
- (Donor 2022)
- Posts: 2632
- Joined: 14 Mar 2001, 23:41
- Location: Epsom, Surrey
- My Cars: 2010 Citroen C5-X7 tourer
1998 Citroen Saxo 1.5D
2018 Citroen C4-B7
1998 Peugeot 306. 1.9D
2011 Citroen C1 - x 72
- Contact:
Re: Eolys Rip Off
It's the idea and the process which is patented therefore anyone else is prohibited from using the same ingredients. The chemical and pharmaceutical industries have their own version of patent law. See here:-cachaciero wrote:
I can't see that it would be that difficult for somebody else to make the same thing with a slight variation and be outside any patent.
cachaciero
In the pharmaceutical, chemical and biotechnology industries the patent normally equals the product, and protects the extensive investment in research required before placing it on the market. Patent protection for chemical and pharmaceutical products is especially important compared with other industries because the actual manufacturing process is often easy to replicate and can be copied with a fraction of the investment of that required for the research and clinical testing.
2010 C5 X7 VTR+Nav 160
1998 1.5 Saxo
1998 Pug 306 1.9D
2018 C4 B7 VTR+
2011 Citroen C1
1998 1.5 Saxo
1998 Pug 306 1.9D
2018 C4 B7 VTR+
2011 Citroen C1