Xsara fuel gauge problems - is this a common fault?

This is the Forum for all your Citroen Technical Questions, Problems or Advice.
User avatar
uhn113x
Posts: 1161
Joined: 06 Jan 2004, 22:06
x 3

Xsara fuel gauge problems - is this a common fault?

Unread post by uhn113x »

Hi folks

A few folks have suggested this is a stock fault, but nobody has come up with a definite answer at all.

Car:
March 2001 Xsara 2.0 HDi - not multiplexed wiring AFAIK, but no idea how to check this!

Fault:
Fuel gauge either works correctly or is about 1/4 too low; when this happens it seems to stay like it until next used.

As there's no Haynes manual for the later Xsara, I cannot see how it's all wired and therefore what to check.

I don't want to start replacing things ad hoc until it's cured - I'll leave that sort of thing to the dealers. I am fine with electronics, BTW.

Any ideas, folks?
Last edited by uhn113x on 22 Aug 2010, 14:18, edited 1 time in total.
Mike in West Yorks
1982 GSA Pallas
1982 Dyane
1997 ZX Dimension
RichardW
Forum Treasurer
Posts: 12440
Joined: 07 Aug 2002, 17:12
x 1430

Unread post by RichardW »

If it's a pre-faclift Xsara (ie with the small head lamps) then it is not multiplexed. If it's got the big headlights, then it will be.

Does the odometer continue to read the correct distance travelled when the speedo is playing up? If it does then you can rule out the speed sensor, if it doesn't then it's probably the speed sensor. If you think it is not the speed sensor then it is most likely the pins where the speedo head is soldered onto the instrument panel PCB. This makes the speedo reading erratic - often hanging at 50 regardless of actual speed. The one in my Xantia reads what it likes most of the time, and can swing from actual speed to 50 and back at will. I just ignore it and use the tacho instead - maybe one day I'll get it out and solder it up, but then I've been saying that for 60k miles now, so maybe not!
Richard W
User avatar
uhn113x
Posts: 1161
Joined: 06 Jan 2004, 22:06
x 3

Unread post by uhn113x »

Apologies, Richard, and a d'oh moment!

I said "speedo" for some strange reason whereas I should have said "fuel gauge".

Crawling back under my stone! :oops:

It is multiplexed, then :( . Is there a wiring diagram avaliable at all, without spending a fortune, as I'm a complete newbie regarding these things.
Mike in West Yorks
1982 GSA Pallas
1982 Dyane
1997 ZX Dimension
wheeler
Posts: 7894
Joined: 21 Sep 2002, 19:07
x 1044

Unread post by wheeler »

RichardW wrote:If it's a pre-faclift Xsara (ie with the small head lamps) then it is not multiplexed.
Thats not quite right the late ph1 xsaras were multiplexed also.
As far as the fuel gauge goes im afraid this is a quirk of the xsara, if you replace every component involved in the circuit it will still operate the same. The gauge takes an initial reading off the sender in the tank then the ECU calculates a theoretical usage & adjusts the gauge, needless to say it doesent always tally up with the sender reading hence why you get erratic readings.
User avatar
uhn113x
Posts: 1161
Joined: 06 Jan 2004, 22:06
x 3

Unread post by uhn113x »

Thanks, wheeler, that's finally answered my question.
:)

That sounds like a typical bit of "progress" - if it ain't broke, it's too simple, so we'll get the design team to find a complex solution that will never work properly!

What was wrong with a bit of wire and a rheostat, one asks?
Mike in West Yorks
1982 GSA Pallas
1982 Dyane
1997 ZX Dimension
User avatar
Clogzz
Posts: 2125
Joined: 15 May 2005, 18:04
x 40

Unread post by Clogzz »

Hi Mike,

It still has a bit of wire and rheostat, but that’s the only good news.
The best chance would be dry joints at the rear of the gauge.
Picture from the Xantia Mk I, hoping it’s not too different.

Image
2002 C5 2.0i AL4 239,000 km 76372389
User avatar
uhn113x
Posts: 1161
Joined: 06 Jan 2004, 22:06
x 3

Unread post by uhn113x »

Thanks, they sure look like a few good DJ's!

From what wheeler says about how it works, though, I might just leave it at that and live with it.

I'd love to see some sort of diagram / explanation on this multiplexed wiring, though.
I'm not a complete duffer on the subject as I used to repair, write books and teach TV / radio / video in a previous life.
Mike in West Yorks
1982 GSA Pallas
1982 Dyane
1997 ZX Dimension
wheeler
Posts: 7894
Joined: 21 Sep 2002, 19:07
x 1044

Unread post by wheeler »

if you ever sort it out be sure & let the rest of the world know how. :lol:
User avatar
uhn113x
Posts: 1161
Joined: 06 Jan 2004, 22:06
x 3

Unread post by uhn113x »

Ah, but from what you said above, it's a design fault and they all do it.

I think the only solution would be to redesign it, and there aren't enough hours in the day for that; retirement takes up all my 25 hours of each 8 day week!

However, if someone had a sender and gauge from a scrappy, it would be tempting to see what happened if I started to go back to a simple solution ... any offers?
Mike in West Yorks
1982 GSA Pallas
1982 Dyane
1997 ZX Dimension
User avatar
Paul-R
Moderating Team
Posts: 8970
Joined: 07 May 2009, 16:24
x 1860

Unread post by Paul-R »

wheeler wrote:The gauge takes an initial reading off the sender in the tank then the ECU calculates a theoretical usage & adjusts the gauge, needless to say it doesent always tally up with the sender reading hence why you get erratic readings.
That's not the way my Xsara behaves so I suspect it's age dependant.

On the 2001 Xsara it's very much like cars used to be.

After a filling to the brim there's quite a delay before the needle moves off the full mark. This then becomes a benchmark to me of how the consumption is going for this tankful. 80 miles is not good, 100 miles is good and anything more than that is exceptional. The 3/4 mark should be reached when about 180 - 220 miles has been covered and by 1/2 way I need to have covered 300 miles in order to be averaging around 50mpg.

The C5 behaves exactly as Wheeler says and it's crap. I really hate it and I wish that I could change whetever it is in the ECU so that the reading is passed on from the TSU straight to the gauge. It's ridiculous that a so-called improvement should be such a negative move. A triumph of "we can do do it so let's" I think.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
As I get older I think a lot about the hereafter - I go into a room and then wonder what I'm here after.

Inside every old person is a young person wondering what the hell happened.

"Trying is the first step towards failure" ~ Homer J Simpson
User avatar
myglaren
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 28417
Joined: 02 Mar 2008, 13:30
x 5573

Unread post by myglaren »

Paul-R wrote: The C5 behaves exactly as Wheeler says and it's crap. I really hate it and I wish that I could change whetever it is in the ECU so that the reading is passed on from the TSU straight to the gauge. It's ridiculous that a so-called improvement should be such a negative move. A triumph of "we can do do it so let's" I think.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
I have never had any problems with my fuel gauge but I always brim it when the low fuel warning appears, rather than incremental fills more frequently.
Probably will now, of course :(
User avatar
Paul-R
Moderating Team
Posts: 8970
Joined: 07 May 2009, 16:24
x 1860

Unread post by Paul-R »

myglaren wrote:..I always brim it when the low fuel warning appears, rather than incremental fills more frequently...
And that's another thing I hate about the C5 fuel gauge - it just completely ignores a 5 litre top-up from the spare fuel can if the light has just come on. On the Xsara it'll go out as it should.

I really would like to shake the designer of this "feature" until his tooth fillings rattle.
As I get older I think a lot about the hereafter - I go into a room and then wonder what I'm here after.

Inside every old person is a young person wondering what the hell happened.

"Trying is the first step towards failure" ~ Homer J Simpson
User avatar
myglaren
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 28417
Joined: 02 Mar 2008, 13:30
x 5573

Unread post by myglaren »

You wouldn't have liked a Renault 11 TXE Electronic then :twisted: