Bad Design !

This is the place for posts that don't fit into any other category.

Moderator: RichardW

Post Reply
ACTIVE8
Posts: 2317
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 16:49
Location: United Kingdom
My Cars:
x 6

Bad Design !

Post by ACTIVE8 »

Well having seen the feature on Fifth Gear about a typical maintenance issue, I nearly fell off my seat laughing at why a manufacturer would design something to be more difficult !

So, is this typical of the new "modern" Euro encap design ?

The Golf they used in the test against the Megane seems to prove to contary.

So if you have the Xenon bulbs it requires even more stripping down, & apparently the bumper has to come off etc. :D LOL

Designers they seem to be going backwards I.E making things more difficult.

Have they been instructed to do this, to ensure main stealers get more work in, and therefore more profits ?

Here's the link Image

http://fifthgear.five.tv/jsp/5gmain.jsp ... Lightbulbs
ACTIVA

The car that looks like a family car, but has special secret hidden abilities.
andmcit
Posts: 4299
Joined: 03 Mar 2005, 17:59
Location: Swansea - South Wales
My Cars:
x 30

Post by andmcit »

In time honored Haynes styley: ;)

to remove Meagne front headlight bulb, jack and support vehicle securely
on axle stands and remove the rear bumper (see section 12), wheels
(see section 1A) and seats (see section 12) but not until you look at section
3 where scary grainy and confusing pictures of engine innards are shown
and there is a special one off 7 spanners icon... :roll:

Plus you'll need a laptop to log into the car's systems and disengage the
primary safety systems but first you need the password! :?

Progress? I feel ABS and airbags where a step too far in car development.

Andrew
ACTIVE8
Posts: 2317
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 16:49
Location: United Kingdom
My Cars:
x 6

................Bad Technique !!

Post by ACTIVE8 »

Check out the way thatthe breakdown guy works on it.

On the clip he is seen going in the boot to get out the jack, and then the car is supported by it, and he is then inside the wheel arch to do the job as Renault intended. So the car is supported by the "basic and poor quality" jack which you should not be using to support the car and get underneath it !

It's only designed to lift the car for wheel changes!!

DO NOT GET UNDER A CAR SUPPORTED IN SUCH A WAY AS IT IS DANGEROUS!!!!
ACTIVA

The car that looks like a family car, but has special secret hidden abilities.
uncle buck
Posts: 591
Joined: 10 Jan 2008, 19:53
Location: UK - North east
My Cars:
x 5

Post by uncle buck »

Don't know how they are getting away with this as in parts of Europe you have to carry spare bulbs by law....how could you possibly be expected to change a bulb at the side of the road if the bumper has to be removed from the car to gain access to replace the bulb!
2006 C4 1.6 HDi 16V (92) non FAP
2001 Xsara II 1.4 LX
2001 Renault Laguna II 1.9dCi Sport Tourer
User avatar
Ross_K
Posts: 1055
Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 22:26
Location: Ireland
Lexia Available: Yes
My Cars: 2009 Citroen C5 VTR+ HDi 1.6
2004 Toyota Prius
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 Twin Spark
x 110

Post by Ross_K »

What about the most expensive quote he got from a Renault dealer?

£200 and something + VAT!! :shock:

Still I suppose times are tough and Renault have to make money where they can... :lol:
ImageImage
ACTIVE8
Posts: 2317
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 16:49
Location: United Kingdom
My Cars:
x 6

Post by ACTIVE8 »

Well if this is how they complicate a simple job, =D> then what other surprises are in store from the manufacturers. :-k

AH !!

Let's guess you need to be a Mensa member to......

Fill a washer bottle as they will hide the filler and suggest the owner visits a main stealer for it to be topped up, refilled or adding washer solvent !

Aim the washer jets so that they spray the screen correctly !

Pump up the tyres !

Well we never expected them to do this heath robinson chumny warner thing with the light bulbs did we, so anything absolutely anything could be made complicated, and I am sure they will try!

Now when a car is many years old, and requires a few light bulbs changing for the MOT, then your average motorist won't be able to afford to have them done, and would not have a clue about the insane, obtuse and complicated way to do it.

So, end result is that it could make the motorist decide the car is beyond economic repair, and ensures the motorist scraps it, or gives it away for a song to get rid of it !

Well done manufacturers, more designed in obsolence ! ](*,)

Oh, also if it complicates this task then what's the bill for changing a headlamp ? :shock:

Does the whole front end of the car have to come apart ? ](*,)

If it does, then it will be more expensive, and think about the "knock-on" effect, please excuse the pun, on insurance work and therefore premiums they are bound to go up !

Insurance companies will use any excuse to get more money off the motorist. :evil:

Like the main stealers, and manufacturers !
ACTIVA

The car that looks like a family car, but has special secret hidden abilities.
jeremy
Posts: 3959
Joined: 20 Oct 2002, 16:00
Location: Hampshire, UK
My Cars:
x 2

Post by jeremy »

All quite daft - like some of you I thought that it was a requirement of the cucumber straightening officials of the EEC that bulbs could be replaced without tools.

However doesn't this mean that there will be a good supply of relatively new cheap cars with minor faults - when those with no practical skills get fed up with them and decide as the bulbs are failing its time they got a new car.

After all many won't touch a hydraulic Citroen - and as members of this board we know that the suspension is possible to repair and does not require expensive tools
jeremy
User avatar
reblack68
Posts: 1047
Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 01:28
Location: United Kingdom
My Cars:

Post by reblack68 »

I don't believe a car should get type approval if you need a tool to replace any of the essential bulbs.

I'm a bit concerned about the design of lighting in general. The current trend for putting indicators inside headlights for example. What drugs would you have to take to make that seem acceptable? Even with the headlight off they are difficult to see from most angles. These LED rear indicators on VWs are as bad, it's very difficult to tell they are indicating if the brake lights are on.

Don't get me started on Xenons :x
Richard

No French cars of my own at present.
Care of a 1994 205 D.
User avatar
Gregg1100
Posts: 601
Joined: 01 Jul 2001, 23:37
Location: Cwmbran S. Wales
My Cars:
x 5

Bad Design !

Post by Gregg1100 »

Hi,
Like Andrew, I feel there is far too much uneccessary junk being put on cars, ABS, and airbags. What was wrong with the old 7" sealed beam headlight units---always gave a better focused light than any of the oblong stuff.
Abs---more trouble than it's worth. In my last but one job, we had brand new Mercedes Actros tri axle units, with brand new tri axle trailers, running at 44 ton. The abs lights were always coming on for sensor trouble ( soon as it rained )and incompatibility with parts.
Airbags- what is all that about.? If the cars today were made of actual metal and not tin foil, perhaps they wouldn't need them.
Rant over #-o :-# .
You have probably worked out I am not keen on this type of stuff. Bring back the Morry 1000, I say. No abs, airbags, leccky windows, and if you were really lucky, no heater matrix buried 3ft. into the cars interior. Some of them didn't even have a heater, :shock:
Greg

90 Kawa EN 500 A1- was running---now dead again
04 Kawa GPZ 500 E10 -alive and well.
54 Fiat Punto 1.2 Dynamic

Old Xantias- 16v 2litre 1997 VSX, 2 x 1993 TD Lx, S2 SX 1.9TD
Old Bx's--3 x 1.9 D, 1x 1.6 Auto, 1 x 1.9 GTi, 1 x 1.9 TZS
User avatar
Xaccers
Posts: 7654
Joined: 07 Feb 2007, 23:46
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
My Cars:
x 184

Post by Xaccers »

reblack68 wrote:I don't believe a car should get type approval if you need a tool to replace any of the essential bulbs.

I'm a bit concerned about the design of lighting in general. The current trend for putting indicators inside headlights for example. What drugs would you have to take to make that seem acceptable? Even with the headlight off they are difficult to see from most angles. These LED rear indicators on VWs are as bad, it's very difficult to tell they are indicating if the brake lights are on.

Don't get me started on Xenons :x
Oh god don't get me started on those blooming indicators!
They're practically invisible, then you get the ones on the wing mirrors, so you dont see them until the nose of the car is stuck well out.
One of the manufacturers is advertising a "blind spot" indicator, an amber light the flashes on the inside of the mirror to warn you that something is in your blind spot.
How many times have you been on the motorway with some git sat in your blind spot? How annoying and distracting would that constant flashing light be in the corner of your eye?
And who thought it would be better to have front fog lights on before rears??? I still can't think of a legitimate reason for that.
Although maybe it's so people don't use their headlights incase the bulbs blow...
1.9TD+ SX Xantia Estate (Cassy) running on 100% veg
1.9TD SX Xantia Hatchback (Jenny) running on 100% veg for sale
Laguna II 2.0dCi Privilege (Monty)

DIY sphere tool
User avatar
Ross_K
Posts: 1055
Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 22:26
Location: Ireland
Lexia Available: Yes
My Cars: 2009 Citroen C5 VTR+ HDi 1.6
2004 Toyota Prius
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 Twin Spark
x 110

Post by Ross_K »

Xac wrote:And who thought it would be better to have front fog lights on before rears??? I still can't think of a legitimate reason for that.
Although maybe it's so people don't use their headlights incase the bulbs blow...
Some muppets think they look cool driving around with just the front fogs on.

I personally think they should be beaten severely about the head with a wheel brace...
ImageImage
User avatar
Clogzz
Posts: 2115
Joined: 15 May 2005, 18:04
Location: Australia
My Cars:
x 36
Contact:

Post by Clogzz »

in parts of Europe you have to carry spare bulbs by law
what other surprises are in store from the manufacturers. :-k
A good surprise with the Xantia. :D
The inner rear sidelight, item 3, has a 21/5W bulb, with the 5W only being used.
So, when the 21W brake bulb fails, it can be swapped for the sidelight bulb.

Image
2002 C5 2.0i AL4 230,000 km 76372389
MikeT
Posts: 4809
Joined: 11 Jun 2007, 16:17
Location: Christchurch, Dorset. UK
My Cars: 2005 C5restyle 1.6HDI 16v 110hp VTR Estate
2008 C5 X7 1.6HDI VTR+ Saloon
x 231

Post by MikeT »

Interesting thread and I think there's a lot of truth in that the designers have lost the plot.

I've just come back from the shops and noticed the Pug 206HDi in front of me had a single, centrally-fitted red (fog?) light, recessed into the rear bumper. (Think F1 cars, it's about the same height/position).

That's fine until, like this car has, a tow bar is fitted which obscures all but the side perimeters of the lens. The insurers will have a field day on that one, methinks. :roll:
User avatar
myglaren
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 25465
Joined: 02 Mar 2008, 13:30
Location: Washington
My Cars: Mazda 6
Ooops.
Previously:
2009 Honda Civic :(
C5, C5, Xantia, BX, GS, Visa.
R4, R11TXE, R14, R30TX
x 4920

Post by myglaren »

IIRC the New Beetle also has to have half the front end dismantled to change a headlamp bulb.
andmcit
Posts: 4299
Joined: 03 Mar 2005, 17:59
Location: Swansea - South Wales
My Cars:
x 30

Post by andmcit »

Ross_K wrote:I personally think they should be beaten severely about the head with a wheel brace...
Me first, me first!! Form an orderly que here.

I have an Xm wheelbrace, that'd do the trick - robust enough to penetrate
their solid thick skulls too!

Andrew
Post Reply