Just a quick one,
when did Mark 2 xantias hit the market? is a 1996 or P reg a mark 2?
bye
all
Mark 2 xantia - what year did these come out?
Moderator: RichardW
-
- Forum Treasurer
- Posts: 10871
- Joined: 07 Aug 2002, 17:12
- Location: United Kingdom
- My Cars: MK2 '17 C4GP 1.6 BlueHDi 120
'13 3008 1.6 HDi GripControl - x 996
The screens have different part nos, but this seems to be to do with the fitment of the rain sensor and athermal coatings. The glass trim surrond has the same part no for MK1 and MK2 suggesting the screen is the same dimension. It is, however, very very unlikely that you can get a screen out without breaking it, and even if you did you'd have to scrape all the gunge off before refitting it - and since the screen is integral to the structural rigidity of the car, I'd want it fitted by someone who knows what they are doing, and has the right 'gunge'
Richard W
thanks all
again - for fast responses,
bye all
ps ive gotten quite a few screens out b4 without breaking them, cut them ou with wire, but i have broken a screen simply by carrying it - 2 people, one at each end, if you don't work in close unison and apply the slightest torsion to it it cracked, it was en early 80s ford so maybe they don't rely on the screen for structural rigidity of the car as a whole. In fact at the time i remember thinking 'gees i would have though the car body would apply greater torques to the glass just by being driven around!', so was left thinking the screen must not be a particularly strong structural member
again - for fast responses,
bye all
ps ive gotten quite a few screens out b4 without breaking them, cut them ou with wire, but i have broken a screen simply by carrying it - 2 people, one at each end, if you don't work in close unison and apply the slightest torsion to it it cracked, it was en early 80s ford so maybe they don't rely on the screen for structural rigidity of the car as a whole. In fact at the time i remember thinking 'gees i would have though the car body would apply greater torques to the glass just by being driven around!', so was left thinking the screen must not be a particularly strong structural member