Hi all,
What about the front of a ZX looks different on a later ZX compared to the earlier one? I do prefer the later ones, but I'm not going to sell mine just to get a later one, this one I have I'm bonding with nicely, so I may fit later body parts on mine, advice would be great.
Thanks, again.
ZX exterior comparison
Moderator: RichardW
Yes, just the grill. A highly efficient redesign to flood the intercooler with air... OK, maybe not.
I've owned both, and like Jeremy says, you can't see it when you're driving. But personally, I like the later one (now!).
James
I've owned both, and like Jeremy says, you can't see it when you're driving. But personally, I like the later one (now!).
James
Now Citroenless for the first time in 20 years
2008 Mazda RX-8 231
2007 Honda CR-V Auto
-
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: 03 Oct 2003, 00:50
- Location: United Kingdom
- My Cars:
- x 1
Have had both and got to admit that the new one I have looks the same apart from the little grill.rossnunn wrote:Just a bonnet/grille replacement is needed to get the later style.
Personally I think the ph1 (dropnose) looks pretty dated now, especially when parked next to a clean ph2.
The wifes got a C4 I've got a ZX TD SX!!!!
I hand painted the bumpers on my last ZX, and intend to do the same with this one. I used a matt black and touched it up now and then to keep it looking nice..
I prefer the front slot on the early ZX personaly. Oddly enough the Honda is very similar in as much as it has a slot, not a grill..
.
I prefer the front slot on the early ZX personaly. Oddly enough the Honda is very similar in as much as it has a slot, not a grill..
.
James. (Nr M67 East of Manchester).
Dark Blue ZX 1.9D Auto 1994 'L' 5 dr (modified) Aura. 98K miles used daily. Ave mpg 40
Wedgewood Blue 75 CTD auto Connoissaur. 2002. 144k. used daily. ave mpg 40 ish.
Dark Blue ZX 1.9D Auto 1994 'L' 5 dr (modified) Aura. 98K miles used daily. Ave mpg 40
Wedgewood Blue 75 CTD auto Connoissaur. 2002. 144k. used daily. ave mpg 40 ish.