Xantia rear suspension
Moderator: RichardW
Xantia rear suspension
Hi Everybody,
Have a problem with a very rigid suspension at the rear of my 96 Xantia 1.8i 16v estate. This has developed over the last couple of weeks.
I have bimbled through the various posts and was just about to order a couple of rear suspension spheres from GSF when I read another post on a different forum which mentioned the anti-sink sphere (in the centre of the rear axle?) having a valve jammed which can cause a similar problem.
I have checked the ride height which is correct. The suspension is now so stiff that the car only travels about 20mm with litl'ol 16st me doing a jig in the boot. This is the same with the engine running or off. After switching the engine off and sitting in the boot the car does not sink and then rise. The front suspension is fine and bounces quite satisfyingly. Selecting various heights with the height selecter works fine although the rear seems slower to react than the front.
So basically do I just need suspension sheres or is there something else I'm missing? The lack of sink and rise when sitting in the boot with the engine off is worrying me.
Have a problem with a very rigid suspension at the rear of my 96 Xantia 1.8i 16v estate. This has developed over the last couple of weeks.
I have bimbled through the various posts and was just about to order a couple of rear suspension spheres from GSF when I read another post on a different forum which mentioned the anti-sink sphere (in the centre of the rear axle?) having a valve jammed which can cause a similar problem.
I have checked the ride height which is correct. The suspension is now so stiff that the car only travels about 20mm with litl'ol 16st me doing a jig in the boot. This is the same with the engine running or off. After switching the engine off and sitting in the boot the car does not sink and then rise. The front suspension is fine and bounces quite satisfyingly. Selecting various heights with the height selecter works fine although the rear seems slower to react than the front.
So basically do I just need suspension sheres or is there something else I'm missing? The lack of sink and rise when sitting in the boot with the engine off is worrying me.
Mick
- CitroJim
- A very naughty boy
- Posts: 49658
- Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 23:33
- Location: Paggers
- My Cars: Bluebell the AX, Polly the C3 Picasso, Pix the Nissan Pixo, Propel the duathlon bike, TCR Pro the road bike and Fuji the TT bike...
- x 6203
- Contact:
Hi Mick,
Looks like a simple case of completely flat spheres to me given that everything else works normally.
I think if you replace the spheres all will be OK. It would not be a bad idea to replace the anti-sink sphere at the same time just for a job well done as it is likely that if your two suspension sphers are gone, the anti-sink will not be far behind.
Looks like a simple case of completely flat spheres to me given that everything else works normally.
I think if you replace the spheres all will be OK. It would not be a bad idea to replace the anti-sink sphere at the same time just for a job well done as it is likely that if your two suspension sphers are gone, the anti-sink will not be far behind.
Jim
Runner, cyclist, time triallist, duathlete, Citroen AX fan and the CCC Citroenian 'From A to Z' Columnist...
Runner, cyclist, time triallist, duathlete, Citroen AX fan and the CCC Citroenian 'From A to Z' Columnist...
- Xaccers
- Posts: 7654
- Joined: 07 Feb 2007, 23:46
- Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
- My Cars:
- x 184
While you're at it, is the accumulator ticking?
If it needs replacing, might as well do it at the same time while the hydraulic system is depressurised.
Do you know when the car was last hydraflushed?
Shine a torch into the LHM resevoir, the fluid should be green, mine's a rusty brown colour so I'll be flushing mine soon as I get a chance!
If it needs replacing, might as well do it at the same time while the hydraulic system is depressurised.
Do you know when the car was last hydraflushed?
Shine a torch into the LHM resevoir, the fluid should be green, mine's a rusty brown colour so I'll be flushing mine soon as I get a chance!
1.9TD+ SX Xantia Estate (Cassy) running on 100% veg
1.9TD SX Xantia Hatchback (Jenny) running on 100% veg for sale
Laguna II 2.0dCi Privilege (Monty)
DIY sphere tool
1.9TD SX Xantia Hatchback (Jenny) running on 100% veg for sale
Laguna II 2.0dCi Privilege (Monty)
DIY sphere tool
-
- Posts: 359
- Joined: 18 Jan 2005, 21:47
- Location: 5 miles N. of Boston, Lincs
- My Cars:
- CitroJim
- A very naughty boy
- Posts: 49658
- Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 23:33
- Location: Paggers
- My Cars: Bluebell the AX, Polly the C3 Picasso, Pix the Nissan Pixo, Propel the duathlon bike, TCR Pro the road bike and Fuji the TT bike...
- x 6203
- Contact:
Indeed, the difference between hard and soft mode is such that you'd think the suspension spheres are flat if the rear is stuck in hard mode. If the hydractive sphere is flat then even if the suspension ECU and electrovalve switches correctly to soft mode it'll still be effectively in hard mode.Peter.N. wrote:I concur. The centre hydractive sphere has more affect on the ride than the others!
Hydractive (if fitted to your car Ms00) is easy to test. Engine stopped at least a minute, put your head a little way under the rear (not too far in!!) and have an assistant open a door. You should hear a click followed by a low buzzing sound as the electrovale opens to put the suspension intio soft mode. Close the door and this low buzzing should end in a distinct click after 30s as the electrovalve closes and the suspension goes back into default hard mode. If you hear a low buzz but no clicks or nothing at all you have a problem with your electrovalves or the wiring to them.
In soft mode, the rear should be just that. Incredibly soft! And in hard, pretty stiff.
If all the above works and there is no difference in feel then the hydractive sphere is flat.
Jim
Runner, cyclist, time triallist, duathlete, Citroen AX fan and the CCC Citroenian 'From A to Z' Columnist...
Runner, cyclist, time triallist, duathlete, Citroen AX fan and the CCC Citroenian 'From A to Z' Columnist...
Hi and thanks for your replies,
I apologise one of my posts went awol. The car isn't hydractive. I have no idea when the car was last (or ever!) hydraflushed. However the fluid is the right colour and looks clean-no rust or cloudiness. The front suspension spheres look a lot newer than the rear ones though that might just be due to location.
Sounds like I might just as well replace all rear spheres as Jim suggested. It wont be until next week now due to work commitments. I'll let you know how it goes.
Thanks for your posts,
I apologise one of my posts went awol. The car isn't hydractive. I have no idea when the car was last (or ever!) hydraflushed. However the fluid is the right colour and looks clean-no rust or cloudiness. The front suspension spheres look a lot newer than the rear ones though that might just be due to location.
Sounds like I might just as well replace all rear spheres as Jim suggested. It wont be until next week now due to work commitments. I'll let you know how it goes.
Thanks for your posts,
Mick
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 01 Apr 2007, 20:21
- Location: Norfolk
- My Cars:
My 1999 Xantia HDI hydractive has a bouncy rear suspension. On flat roads it’s fine, but give it a couple of bumps in quick succession and the back is like a bronco. This can also happen at high speed, if the road surface is just so – there’s a patch on the M25 near Gatwick that does it.
I have already replaced the hydractive (rear centre) sphere and the rear anti-sink sphere without noticeable change. Whilst in France a mechanic ventured the guess it might be "electronique".
Any suggestions. please?
I have already replaced the hydractive (rear centre) sphere and the rear anti-sink sphere without noticeable change. Whilst in France a mechanic ventured the guess it might be "electronique".
Any suggestions. please?
The anti-sink sphere wont have any significant effect on the ride.Richard Stevens wrote:My 1999 Xantia HDI hydractive has a bouncy rear suspension. On flat roads it’s fine, but give it a couple of bumps in quick succession and the back is like a bronco. This can also happen at high speed, if the road surface is just so – there’s a patch on the M25 near Gatwick that does it.
I have already replaced the hydractive (rear centre) sphere and the rear anti-sink sphere without noticeable change. Whilst in France a mechanic ventured the guess it might be "electronique".
Any suggestions. please?
What about the condition of the rear corner spheres ? They are important too, and provide a lot of the "large bump" absorption and damping. The hydractive centre sphere is more about smoothing the smaller bumps and giving the magic carpet effect.
The rear corner and hydractive spheres both work together in the "soft" mode to contribute to the final result. In the "hard" mode only the corner spheres are operating so if they are flat the ride will be "OKish" in the soft mode, but will become rigid whenever it switches to hard mode. (And bounce on the tyres)
You should be able to establish this with a simple bounce test - let the engine idle and try pressing down the rear - it should be very easy to press down to the bump stops.
Now turn the engine off, leave all doors and boot closed and wait more than 30 seconds - now try sitting on the boot - it should be a lot stiffer than before, but it should still move at least 50mm when you sit on it. If its pretty much rigid then look at replacing those corner spheres...
Regards,
Simon
Simon
1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White
2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
1978 CX 2400
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White
2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
1978 CX 2400
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 01 Apr 2007, 20:21
- Location: Norfolk
- My Cars:
Simon,
Many thanks for your info. I recognise what you say, and was even out on the car trying the various modes this morning.
In 'soft' mode there's a fair amount of movement, but probably not as much as you suggest there should be. After 30 seconds from closing doors with the engine off it goes virtually solid. The French opinion I got recently kind of steered me away from spheres and I've been attempting to understand the electrics.
By the look of them the rear spheres haven't been replaced (in 8 years) so it's a good move regardless. I attempted to move them a couple of months ago, without success.
Thanks again, I'll let you know the results.
Richard
Many thanks for your info. I recognise what you say, and was even out on the car trying the various modes this morning.
In 'soft' mode there's a fair amount of movement, but probably not as much as you suggest there should be. After 30 seconds from closing doors with the engine off it goes virtually solid. The French opinion I got recently kind of steered me away from spheres and I've been attempting to understand the electrics.
By the look of them the rear spheres haven't been replaced (in 8 years) so it's a good move regardless. I attempted to move them a couple of months ago, without success.
Thanks again, I'll let you know the results.
Richard
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 01 Apr 2007, 20:21
- Location: Norfolk
- My Cars:
Sorted! Having read and understood the Technical notes I found on a link, I decided to go ahead and replace the two main rear spheres, as you advised. What a difference! My wife will come driving with me again, so it's a two-edged sword! No really, the notes were great, it's so much better not groping around in the dark, as I was before. I also didn't realise the suspension system is so clever. Many thanks.
Hey, great news.
Often people focus too much on the centre sphere and forget the strut spheres, or vica versa - ideally, they should be replaced together as a set of 3 as they all lose pressure at about the same rate, and they all contribute to the ride and handling.
Usually its the centre sphere that gets overlooked because it doesn't exist on a non-Hydractive model, (therefore less familiarity of its existence and purpose) and is well away from the suspension.
Once it goes flat you effectively have the hard mode ride all the time, even when the computer is selecting soft mode.
The other way around - as you had, where the centre sphere is ok but the strut spheres are flat, give a very different scenario - soft mode is stiffer than it should be, but still has some give, but can't cope with large bumps, while the hard mode may be almost rigid - and this can actually be a dangerous handling situation.
Imagine you're taking a fast corner and the rear suspension is in soft mode - then the computer switches you into hard mode to minimize body roll, suddenly the rear suspension goes rigid, because the rear suspension is now suddenly much stiffer than the front it upsets the under/oversteer balance, and the back could potentially oversteer and slide out, particularly on a rough surface.
Something to be aware of.
Also your description of it bouncing at the rear in response to large bumps makes sense - there is a "body movement sensor" at the front that monitors for very large or fast movements of the front suspension, and switches the suspension (both front and rear) into hard mode momentarily to either prevent the suspension bottoming, or control the rebound in response to a violent suspension movement - but with those faulty spheres the rear suspension would become rigid for a moment. Not good...
Regards,
Simon
Often people focus too much on the centre sphere and forget the strut spheres, or vica versa - ideally, they should be replaced together as a set of 3 as they all lose pressure at about the same rate, and they all contribute to the ride and handling.
Usually its the centre sphere that gets overlooked because it doesn't exist on a non-Hydractive model, (therefore less familiarity of its existence and purpose) and is well away from the suspension.
Once it goes flat you effectively have the hard mode ride all the time, even when the computer is selecting soft mode.
The other way around - as you had, where the centre sphere is ok but the strut spheres are flat, give a very different scenario - soft mode is stiffer than it should be, but still has some give, but can't cope with large bumps, while the hard mode may be almost rigid - and this can actually be a dangerous handling situation.
Imagine you're taking a fast corner and the rear suspension is in soft mode - then the computer switches you into hard mode to minimize body roll, suddenly the rear suspension goes rigid, because the rear suspension is now suddenly much stiffer than the front it upsets the under/oversteer balance, and the back could potentially oversteer and slide out, particularly on a rough surface.
Something to be aware of.
Also your description of it bouncing at the rear in response to large bumps makes sense - there is a "body movement sensor" at the front that monitors for very large or fast movements of the front suspension, and switches the suspension (both front and rear) into hard mode momentarily to either prevent the suspension bottoming, or control the rebound in response to a violent suspension movement - but with those faulty spheres the rear suspension would become rigid for a moment. Not good...
Regards,
Simon
Simon
1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White
2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
1978 CX 2400
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White
2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
1978 CX 2400
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 01 Apr 2007, 20:21
- Location: Norfolk
- My Cars:
Simon,
Luckily I had changed the hydractive sphere earlier this year. This was because the suspension felt soft when I got out of the car, so the thinking was that the main spheres were okay. I know different now and it was your assertion that the back should still move down around 50mm (and the system description and diagrams) which convinced me that it had to be the main spheres.
I think we tend to look for the more obscure solutions very often, but ignorance encourages this.
As I said, a Citroen mechanic in France actually leaned on the back of the car, felt the movement, and declared the problem must be electronic. That did throw me off for a while and I determined to find out how the system works.
One thing I haven't found out, though, is the function of the anti-sink sphere. Is it just a pressure head for when the car is parked to prevent sinking, or is there a running function?
Lastly, on the way back home on Saturday with my new spheres (before fitting them) I saw a '98 Xantia estate going along, not very fast, with the front end gently rocking up and down. I wanted to stop and 'do the tests' but there was too much traffic.
Good driving - mine is now!
Regards
Richard
Luckily I had changed the hydractive sphere earlier this year. This was because the suspension felt soft when I got out of the car, so the thinking was that the main spheres were okay. I know different now and it was your assertion that the back should still move down around 50mm (and the system description and diagrams) which convinced me that it had to be the main spheres.
I think we tend to look for the more obscure solutions very often, but ignorance encourages this.
As I said, a Citroen mechanic in France actually leaned on the back of the car, felt the movement, and declared the problem must be electronic. That did throw me off for a while and I determined to find out how the system works.
One thing I haven't found out, though, is the function of the anti-sink sphere. Is it just a pressure head for when the car is parked to prevent sinking, or is there a running function?
Lastly, on the way back home on Saturday with my new spheres (before fitting them) I saw a '98 Xantia estate going along, not very fast, with the front end gently rocking up and down. I wanted to stop and 'do the tests' but there was too much traffic.
Good driving - mine is now!
Regards
Richard
The function of the anti-sink sphere is a bit strange. Basically the system without the anti-sink valve leaks quite nicely which doesn't cause any problems when running but over a short or long while the whole thing depressurises and sinks. (Like BX and older ones and even early Xantias.)
The anti-sink valve is a very tightly machined valve which shuts when the supply pressure drops when the engine is shut off. It locks the pressure in the suspension - but not the rest of the circuit, The anti-sink valve opens when it receives greater pressure from the pump when the engine starts - but the rest of the circuit has no pressure - and so in fact the suspension drops when the valve opens. The sphere provides a reserve of pressure to prevent this.
The anti-sink valve is a very tightly machined valve which shuts when the supply pressure drops when the engine is shut off. It locks the pressure in the suspension - but not the rest of the circuit, The anti-sink valve opens when it receives greater pressure from the pump when the engine starts - but the rest of the circuit has no pressure - and so in fact the suspension drops when the valve opens. The sphere provides a reserve of pressure to prevent this.
jeremy