The footprint is definitely on the larger side in car terms - at least in 1998 terms if not necessarily today! The footprint is basically identical to that of a SWB Transit of the same era, I wouldn't be surprised if it's actually shorter than the Volvo. Definitely be easier to park than the Volvo as there's not a mile and a half of bonnet that you can't see in front of you. Doesn't have the turning circle of the QE2 either which is definitely a failing of my particular model of Volvo.CitroJim wrote: 07 Nov 2025, 05:39 That certainly is a well thought out vehicle. Bit bulky for the UK perhaps?
A good European version might be an early C4 Picasso. It will tick most, if not all, of the boxes the Chevvy does...
You know me, I'm a great fan of proper MPVsI mourn the fact that none are really sensibly available these days
![]()
It's definitely a different beast to the likes of the C4 Picasso - the amount of usable interior volume for one. The fact that you can have three rows of seats in AND still have a usable load area is one big one - and where the VW Multivan that Chris currently has really falls down and means that the rearmost two seats are permanent, bulky residents in our conservatory that I'm sick of tripping over as with them in the boot is about the size of the one in a Pug 107. The fact that there isn't ten miles of dashboard stretching out in front of the driver before you get to the windscreen I reckon is where that space is really saved - the engine sits pretty much in between the driver and passenger's legs like on my old Merc camper. The mechanicals are very different as well - this is based around a pretty much bulletproof commercial platform which has been taken and had things like the spring and damper rates adjusted accordingly and with a bunch of extra sound dampening rather than a car which has been stretched in Photoshop. So they're tough as old boots (the number of this generation you still see especially in panel van form still earning their keep in the US today is testament to that), and the fact that they made about seven billion of them means that parts availability isn't a problem. Especially the old V6 Vortec engine which has been used in everything from this to generators to power boats Wikipedia entry for this engine over here.
This example had 128K miles on the clock and despite the reputation that US vehicles seem to have for being shoddily built it drove like a brand new car - there wasn't a single knock, squeak, rattle, vibration or anything like that aside from a *tiny* bit of noise from one of the sliding doors on very badly corrugated road surfaces. Which was only really noticeable because it was otherwise so damned quiet.
Also I have to say that a C4 Picasso isn't even in the same league comfort wise. To get a seat in a Citroen that even comes close to as comfy as those chairs you'd need to go back to an early BX I reckon. They make the seats in the Volvo feel like park benches in comparison.
I think that's the thing which surprised me the most about this - how much it didn't feel like a van. GM clearly put a huge amount of effort into making it feel refined. The only really van like things you noticed from the driver's seat were that you were so high up and far forward - which honestly in this day of everyone having cars the size of a small planet is no bad thing as I might actually be able to see over the car next to me at junctions. There was none of the jittery ride or boominess to the interior which I tend to associate with van based vehicles - wind and road noise were both very much more subdued than I'd expected. Especially given the fairly crude by our standards suspension design.furriegurrie wrote: 07 Nov 2025, 07:42 I’ve got a Renault Grand Espace initiale V6 automatic from early 2004 which does all these things too. Great van without actually feeling or looking like a van.
The platform does have major advantages as well - like the whole engine surround coming off in about five minutes allowing access to pretty much everything from inside the cabin rather than everything being completely inaccessible under the windscreen scuttle, it's essentially built with commercial vehicle servicing needs in consideration. I've never done battle with one as new as yours, but I did help with a couple of jobs on the original version and have worked on a couple of other MPVs over the years - every time swearing never again because of how inaccessible essentially everything under the bonnet is. I won't argue though that a high spec early 00s Espace is indeed a very, very nice place to be. Never driven one but I was a passenger in one a while ago and it was indeed very plush.





