AndersDK wrote:Some of our MOT stations I believe have automated inputs from rolling roads to the station computer. It's indeed very simple to hook up with standard PC's.
If the brakes fail the certificate will state a fail on the brakes - no matter the tester input.
I would'nt btw like the idea of passing a car if I know something was wrong with the brakes. I'd rather repair the brakes or find another bargain with good brakes (and some new niggles). After all it's not that expensive to find another daily runner with a fresh MOT.
DON'T GET ME WRONG - I'M NOT IN THE HABIT OF DRIVING DODGY CARS!!
Especially a v6 24v Xm with 200bhp on tap - you kind of need bloody good brakes...
The point is, I sometimes take up to a dozen cars a year for an MOT here [NO - I'm not a dealer!] and HE KNOWS that when I present for testing IT WILL BE 100% so I'll not waste his and my time [and my money!!] with retesting.
When I have to restest he usually sees the car the NEXT DAY sorted and he KNOWS I'm a Citroen nutter devoted to the cause!!
With this new regime of testing a pass wasn't available because the rolling road readings WERE INPUT [he showed me!!]. He DIDN'T want to sit around for 28minutes doing nothing in the allocated computerised time for the retest
They're only allowed a fixed number of tests per day in exact-to-the-minute time slots - if you're late by a few minutes the test is voided in that timetable!! He HATES this as the backlog of appointments stretches out longer and longer...
I actually took the car back with a sorted calliper the following morning AND was 'relieved' of another 35quid for two mintes service
Andrew