Air bubbles in the LHM gives harsh ride?

This is the Forum for all your Citroen Technical Questions, Problems or Advice.
User avatar
AndersDK
Posts: 6060
Joined: 21 Feb 2003, 04:56
x 1

Unread post by AndersDK »

steelcityuk wrote:Is the security valve a one way design?
No.
The security valve is designed to open the source pressure for suspension when the source pressure is past the 100bar limit. While the source/system pressure is higher than 100bar, then the valve is simply open for flow - or pressure changes - both directions to/fro the suspension.

When the system/source pressure is below 100bar the valve is positively shut towards the suspension.

The valve will shut ONLY if the source pressure has fallen below 100bar. I.e. any remaining pressure in the suspension system past 100bar will work backwards as well on the source side - keeping the valve open until both sides of the valve has fallen below 100bar.

Thats is not a one-way function. And thats not the purpose of the security valve. Its purpose is exclusively to keep all system sourced pressure below 100bar reserved for the brakes. Its also designated as the priority valve, because the brakes will always be the first and the last system to be pressure sourced by this valve.
Anders (DK) - '90 BX16Image
User avatar
Mandrake
Posts: 8692
Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 17:23
x 694

Unread post by Mandrake »

Just giving a bit more thought on the low pressure possibility and reflecting on some of the symptoms I've observed over the last year....

If low pressure was the problem, the ride should only be harsher than normal in the soft mode - in the hard mode the pressure provided by the electrovalve is zero anyway - so what does your car ride like if you remove the HA2 fuse forcing hard mode ?

Yes, the ride should be quite stiff/firm in this state, obviously, somewhat like a sports car, and somewhat bumpy, but it should not have that nasty harshness over potholes/manhole covers that rattles your teeth that we are chasing...

I have noticed in the past that certain types of road irregularities - especially very abrupt steps in the seal actually seem to get hit more harshly in the soft mode... (more of a thump that goes through the body of the car) and that if I flick the accelerator pedal just before hitting the bump (putting it into hard mode) it doesn't hit it nearly as harshly.

That was some time ago though when there were a few other problems that have since been fixed. I might go for a drive minus fuse and see what the current status is...

On the other hand air bubbles in the suspension lines are more likely to be much more obvious in the hard mode than the soft mode, as you are removing most of the compressible medium from the circuit.. (knowing my luck I've probably had/have both problems :lol: )

Regards,
Simon
Simon

2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White

1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1978 CX 2400
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

I'm going in the direction of low pressure at least until I can sort out the low regulator cycles. The ride was much better when the cycles were long. I've noticed that on page 10 of the SC/MAC manual it does state that to manually depressurize the system you need to 'establish a pressure of 150 to 180 bars'.

The more postings I read on the XM forum the more answers came back with the same fixes. First check the diodes then system pressure. Looking at the hydraulic circuit diagram on page 8 of the SC/MAC manual it does make sense to me. It also fits as to why with age Hydractive cars ride gets harsh.

Off outside for a play around to see if I can trace this leak.

Steve.
not applicable
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

With the car ticking over at normal height the regulator cycles at 6 second intervals. If I disconnect the front electrovalve this increases to about 60 seconds. I now need to fool the ECU into keeping the voltage onto one electrovalve whilst the other is disconnected. Just need to find the correct resistor size. I want to see if the fault is front or back or both.

Steve.
not applicable
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

I used a 12v bulb to fool the ECU into thinking the electrovalve was still connected. With the front electrovalve disconnected and the bulb in it's place the regulator cycle time was 20 seconds. I tried to connect the bulb in the place of the rear electrovalve but I couldn't get the connector off and the body wouldn't swivel either, the whole thing was very rusty so I decided to remove it, clean it up and check it over. I found no obvious faults like the lest time. I decided to remove the brass coloured plug and check inside for dirt or perished O rings. I found nothing. It's raining again so it'll be tomorrow before I can refit it to the car.

Image
not applicable
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

So I finally refitted the rear HA block and electrovalve onto the Xantia, as the weather was nice I decided to remove, strip and clean the rear HC as well. I was surprised just how much dirty LHM came out the thing, I've only recently flushed and replaced the fluid in the system. Anyhow by Friday evening it was all back together. No difference to the ride whatsoever. That said the regulator cycle time was still 6 or 7 seconds so it wasn't surprising.

Yesterday I removed the regulator and stripped it, what a complete pain it was to remove the spring clip holding in the single bolt mounting end, it took an hour just to remove this. Everything looked OK but I think like the pump it's been replaced by a previously enjoyed one. In a moment of boredom/desperation I decided to shim it up to increase it's pressure. I had no idea what sort of pressures the regulator was cutting in and out at - I haven't got my gauge sorted yet. I found some repair washers in the local B&Q that I could modify to fit, based on the XM forums postings adding a 0.1mm equals 1 bar increase so these shims I've added have increased the regulator pressures by 10 bar. So both cut in and out are now 10 bar higher than they were. I also reseated the ball bearing with a brass bolt. I was full of hope that this would be the magic fix...

So I got it all back together and went for a spin. No different, still harsh. However whilst sat at the lights I found that if I blipped the throttle I could hear a faint clunk as the LED indicated a switch into hard mode, never heard that before. Back home with the car ticking over I found that if I changed the height and blipped the throttle the clunk was accompanied with a small jump in height, this I thought would be as the extra spheres were switched in and out. So somethings changed.

Can anyone else hear their HA valves move when they blip the throttle?

Following this I decided to check the cycle time of the regulator, so with the bonnet open I sat on the slam panel, sure enough as the car adjusted it's height the regulator clicked a couple of times then stopped, after 7 minutes of waiting I got bored of waiting and thought it's either very good or very bad. I got off the panel, the front dropped down again, I sat on the panel again which prompted a couple of regulator cycles as it rose then nothing again. Is this an excessively long cycle time?

Next I thought I'd check the firmness of the suspension with the engine running, nice and soft at the front but the back seemed a little firm which was strange because as I accelerated on my 'test drive' the back was dipping quite a lot. So I stopped the engine closed the doors and checked again, same as with the engine running, soft at the front and firm at the back. After the time out the car went into hard mode (confirmed by the LED) I checked again, very firm at the front and now very soft at the back! I didn't believe it so I opened a door and checked again. Sure enough in soft mode the back was very firm and after the 30 second time out very soft! So I think that either the pipes to the rear HA valve are mixed up or the internals of the valve are wrong. I've either dropped one or a previous person has and I've copied their mistake. I'm going to have a look at the SC/MAC diagram to see if a pipe in the wrong place will do this.

Any thoughts?

Happy New Year all!

Steve.
not applicable
User avatar
Mandrake
Posts: 8692
Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 17:23
x 694

Unread post by Mandrake »

Wow, a lot of confusing and some conflicting results here, I'll see if I can make any sense of it.... :lol:
steelcityuk wrote:So I finally refitted the rear HA block and electrovalve onto the Xantia, as the weather was nice I decided to remove, strip and clean the rear HC as well. I was surprised just how much dirty LHM came out the thing, I've only recently flushed and replaced the fluid in the system. Anyhow by Friday evening it was all back together. No difference to the ride whatsoever. That said the regulator cycle time was still 6 or 7 seconds so it wasn't surprising.
Yeah cleaning the height corrector wont have much direct effect on the ride, unless it was so chocka with crap that it couldn't maintain the correct ride height.

Usually when they get sludge in them they just get very slow at responding to height changes - it might take 15 or 20 seconds instead of the usual 5 seconds to respond to a change in height. It's good to clean them out though, I've done both of mine...
Yesterday I removed the regulator and stripped it, what a complete pain it was to remove the spring clip holding in the single bolt mounting end, it took an hour just to remove this.
Yikes... I hope you were careful, and forewarned of the dangers of that spring during disassembly.
Everything looked OK but I think like the pump it's been replaced by a previously enjoyed one. In a moment of boredom/desperation I decided to shim it up to increase it's pressure. I had no idea what sort of pressures the regulator was cutting in and out at - I haven't got my gauge sorted yet. I found some repair washers in the local B&Q that I could modify to fit, based on the XM forums postings adding a 0.1mm equals 1 bar increase so these shims I've added have increased the regulator pressures by 10 bar. So both cut in and out are now 10 bar higher than they were. I also reseated the ball bearing with a brass bolt. I was full of hope that this would be the magic fix...
Yep, its 1 bar per 0.1mm according to my book. Normal pressures are 170 +/- 5 bars for cut out and 145 +/- 5 bars for cut in, so the pressure being 10 bars higher than normal is not going to hurt anything...
So I got it all back together and went for a spin. No different, still harsh.
:(
However whilst sat at the lights I found that if I blipped the throttle I could hear a faint clunk as the LED indicated a switch into hard mode, never heard that before.
Yes, thats normal, if you blip the throttle at the lights, the electrovalves are noisy enough that you can hear them switch at idle. (But not while driving)

What you probably don't know, is that will only happen AFTER you have driven somewhere since turning on the key. EG if you start the engine and start blipping the throttle, it won't do anything.

But if you then back out of your garage and then drive back in again you'll find that blipping the throttle WILL have an effect... basically reading the throttle sensor is not activated until the ECU detects some minimum road speed since the last reset. (This is described somewhere in the HA2 training manual...)
Back home with the car ticking over I found that if I changed the height and blipped the throttle the clunk was accompanied with a small jump in height, this I thought would be as the extra spheres were switched in and out. So somethings changed.
Ok, so what you're saying is the car is idling at normal height, the LED is on, then you change the height a bit, blip the throttle (causing the LED to go off then on again, as it should) and that causes a jump in the height ?

That sounds suspicious.... it sounds like you might have faulty diodes in one or both electrovalves.

What happens normally is this - the ECU provides 12v DC for half a second every time it switches from hard to soft, and then it drops back to a pulse width modulated signal at 1Khz with a peak voltage of 12v and average of about 3v. (You should notice your LED initially comes on bright, and then goes slightly dimmer, depending on what resistor value you used)

This is because 3v is not enough to switch the electrovalve on, but 12v is too much dissipation in the coil for long term running, so it pulses it to get it to switch, and then drops back to a lower voltage which is enough to hold it in without overheating.

Inside the coil sleve is a reverse connected (back EMF) diode just like you would have across a relay coil, and without this diode the electrovalve will switch on when it gets the initial full 12v DC, but will drop out again half a second later when the ECU drops back to the pulse modulation.

So the result is that the suspension is actually in hard mode all the time EXCEPT for half a second when the ECU is switching from hard to soft. So you change height but because the centre sphere is closed off the pressure can't equalize - when you blip the throttle the electrovalve opens for half a second, the pressure equalizes (and causes a jump in height) and then it goes back to hard mode again.

See my message about half way down this thread:

http://www.frenchcarforum.co.uk/forum/v ... 3&start=15
Can anyone else hear their HA valves move when they blip the throttle?

Following this I decided to check the cycle time of the regulator, so with the bonnet open I sat on the slam panel, sure enough as the car adjusted it's height the regulator clicked a couple of times then stopped, after 7 minutes of waiting I got bored of waiting and thought it's either very good or very bad. I got off the panel, the front dropped down again, I sat on the panel again which prompted a couple of regulator cycles as it rose then nothing again. Is this an excessively long cycle time?
Not really...the fact that the regulator cycles at all when the car standing is only due to slight leakage in the system from the various units which are connected to the high pressure supply (height correctors, brake doseur, electrovalves to name a few) and when the leakage is very low you can get very long cycle times.

When I first replaced my leaky electrovalve the cycle time went up to nearly 5 minutes... but it is a lot lower than that now, about a minute.
Next I thought I'd check the firmness of the suspension with the engine running, nice and soft at the front but the back seemed a little firm which was strange because as I accelerated on my 'test drive' the back was dipping quite a lot. So I stopped the engine closed the doors and checked again, same as with the engine running, soft at the front and firm at the back. After the time out the car went into hard mode (confirmed by the LED) I checked again, very firm at the front and now very soft at the back! I didn't believe it so I opened a door and checked again. Sure enough in soft mode the back was very firm and after the 30 second time out very soft! So I think that either the pipes to the rear HA valve are mixed up or the internals of the valve are wrong.
Well that is just totally bizare! I can't see any possible way that the hard/soft modes could get transposed like that, especially at just one end of the car. You're not opening the boot to sit in the boot are you ? The boot lid triggers the soft mode just like the side doors do.

There is no external piping that could get mixed up that would give those symptoms....

Is it still soft at the back with the Hydractive fuse removed ?

If you disassembled the block is it possible you reassembled it incorrectly ? (Can the main slide valve be accidentally reversed inside ? I've never taken the main block apart before....)

Regards,
Simon
Simon

2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White

1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1978 CX 2400
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

I was very careful of the spring tension when stripping the regulator, I had the HA block in the vice with soft jaws fitted then the spring compressed with a large G clamp and I wore safety googles too!

Thing is about the valves clunking I've never heard them before even whilst stood still and blipping the throttle, make me think that there wasn't enough system pressure to activate them a low revs. They now clunk as the system goes into hard mode, the LED goes out at the slightest touch of the throttle, so I don't think that it's the rise in system pressure just the switch over into hard mode.

Whilst changing height blipping the throttle does make the car jump, only a tiny amount, which I guess is the difference in pressures equalising across the spheres. Seems reasonably normal to me.

I'll reconnect my diodes in the ECU box and see what that brings.

The strange thing is that the back is hard when it's supposed to be soft (according to the diode (I take reference from the LED with all checks - LED on = soft, LED off = hard) and soft when it's supposed to be hard. Removing the fuses doesn't disable the Hydractive system on mine, I can only assume that when the towbar electrics were fitted this had some effect - a back feed for instance. So I have to remove a electrovalve connector to force hard mode. I'll check again.

I wondered if the pipes were mixed up from the SC/MAC and the height corrector would this cause this problem - hard when the electrovalve was energised and vice versa. I don't think I rebuilt the HA block wrong but as I said if it had already been apart and reassembled wrong then I rebuilt it wrong. The main slide valve only seemed to fit one way round. A photo of a dissassembled valve with all the parts in the right order would help.

I'm going to run a few more tests first before I start taking it apart again.

Simon, have you come to any conclusions with yours yet with regards to the pressure as suggested in the XM threads?

Steve.
not applicable
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

It seems that the pipes weren't mixed up but that I'd re-assembled the rear HA block wrong. So with this rebuilt correctly. I took the car for a spin and guess what, it's very smooth, definately going into soft mode and staying there. I've yet to do lots of Citrobics and check the ride height. Let's hope that it's still smooth tomorrow.

So at this stage it would seem it was low hydraulic pressure that was the main problem made worse by the failed O ring.

I'll update in a few days.

Steve.
not applicable
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

The ride is still good. Fingers crossed it continues.

Steve.
not applicable
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

Still smooth.
not applicable
bernie
Posts: 882
Joined: 10 Apr 2001, 02:25

Unread post by bernie »

steelcityuk wrote:Still smooth.


Looking good :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
3 Fiat 124 Sport 1969x2, 1968
2 Fiat 124 Spider 1976, 1971
1 Fiat 20VT Coupe Plus
BUT maybe moving to France
citronut
Posts: 10937
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 00:46
x 94

Unread post by citronut »

well with all the input into this topic it had to be something daft,as i dont usualy find hydraulic citroens that much of a problem
good to here it sounds like you have cracked it though
regards malcolm
User avatar
Mandrake
Posts: 8692
Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 17:23
x 694

Unread post by Mandrake »

So err, what was the problem then ? I've lost track of all the details of this thread :lol:

I'm presuming that the back to front slide valve reversing the operation of the rear block was just an introduced problem when it was disassembled and put back together, and wasn't there before ?

So, leaking electrovalve and (possibly) regulator pressure a bit low ? Perhaps something inadvertently disturbed during all the work ? Who knows ? :?

So, bernie, have you done anything to your regulator thus far ? (Tested the pressure?) I havn't touched mine, although I was thinking about doing the reseating of the ball valve soon...(unfortunately some other stuff has come up for the remainder of my holidays so I might not have time for a while, and the car is riding very well about 80% of the time now...)

Out of all the things Steve has been doing the pressure regulator is the only thing I havn't already done...

Regards,
Simon
Simon

2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White

1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1978 CX 2400
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
x 1

Unread post by steelcityuk »

It couldn't last could it, the ride is hard again. However I notice that the cycle time of the regulator has gone back to 6 seconds. All I need to do is find the source of the internal leak. At least I know that all the valves and electrics work on the HA system and I know just how nice a Xantia can be.

Maybe I will have to buy a pressure gauge after all. I'm still convinced that it's a lack of pressure that's the cause.

Steve.
not applicable