This it?Lifetime member of the 2.1TD fan club.
http://www.lacentrale.fr/photo-auto-occ ... annee=1992
This it?Lifetime member of the 2.1TD fan club.
The vehicle mentioned refutes the otherwise fairly true statement that no cars of today are truly all bad.... this one is a REAL POS!
lolingram:
This it?
http://www.lacentrale.fr/photo-auto-occ ... annee=1992
Jim:
Fortunately, the only similarity between the 2.1TD object of my affection and the ISO container on wheels you've depicted there is the colour
I'm suprised such a "small" engine as a 2.1 can propel that particular vehicle. The picture says it's a "Limited" What does that mean exactly? Limited performance? Limited appeal? Limited styling? Whatever, my interest in such a device is a certainly limited
Andrew, we really must look at yours as there must be something the matter. Gareth's in my ownership was not at all bad and on a run it would do high 30s. I'm sure my red one is even better than that, especially when she drinks V-Power. 160 miles yesterday on a 1/4 of a tank.andmcit wrote: The worst Citroen on fuel ever? (I don't drive anything else! Ever!).
My Activa; it's truly beyond Oliver Reed proportions, so bad I've gone into
denial and won't actually face up to how much it uses so I don't depress
myself, but bad enough to make me check for leaks...
The 2.1 in the Cherokee was certainly not a Citroen engine... apparently it was French though, a Renault....citrojim wrote:No!
![]()
Fortunately, the only similarity between the 2.1TD object of my affection and the ISO container on wheels you've depicted there is the colour
I'm suprised such a "small" engine as a 2.1 can propel that particular vehicle. The picture says it's a "Limited" What does that mean exactly? Limited performance? Limited appeal? Limited styling? Whatever, my interest in such a device is a certainly limited![]()
![]()