No some TDCi's are HDi's!.deian wrote:
The TDCi and the HDi are the same engine.
The 1.4 and 1.6 TDCi ARE HDi's.
The old TDCi 2.0 used in the Mundano wasn't an HDi, it was a Ford engine.
ps
No some TDCi's are HDi's!.deian wrote:
The TDCi and the HDi are the same engine.
Guilty as charged m'Lud 8) I was devilishly playing around with the naughty word censor the other daynick wrote: psI like the way "Mundano" is censored to "Non-Citroen" by the forum. Is that a recent thing?
nick wrote:
Common rail diesels do seem to stall more easily than older tech diesels though. The worst I have known in this respect was a Non-Citroen TDCi I used to drive - the HDi isn't bad in comparison!
deian wrote:
The TDCi and the HDi are the same engine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Duratorq_enginenick wrote: No some TDCi's are HDi's!.
The 1.4 and 1.6 TDCi ARE HDi's.
The old TDCi 2.0 used in the Mundano wasn't an HDi, it was a Ford engine.
psI like the way "Mundano" is censored to "Non-Citroen" by the forum. Is that a recent thing?
I didn't actually say Non-Citroen in my original post, I used the naughty M-word and the forum subsequently changed it!deian wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Duratorq_engine
Looking at the engine's applications, that engine is used in both ford and citroen as hdi and tdci, as 1.4, 1.6, 2.0 and 2.2 at certain times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSA_HDi_engine.
You did say the a "Non-Citroen" TDCi, so unless you meant the older TDDi (dld) this wasn't a HDi engine no, but in 2005 it was a HDi/TDCi engine, which is what you said it was?
Without a doubt one of the boards most outstanding features. Unlike so many of the others people act like adults here without stifling a bit of humour when it crops up.nick wrote:Yes, thats what I like about this site. I think this is the only forum I have been posting on for over 7 years!deian wrote:It's great that we did not argue or fall out over this issue, as some would on other forums.