Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

This is the place for posts that don't fit into any other category.

Moderator: RichardW

Hell Razor5543
NOT Alistair or Simon
Posts: 10343
Joined: 01 Apr 2012, 09:47
x 943

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by Hell Razor5543 »


MikeT
Posts: 4838
Joined: 11 Jun 2007, 16:17
x 186

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by MikeT »

GiveMeABreak wrote:
04 Jul 2019, 19:41
So 2001 a Space Odyssey was just a figment of our imagination then I suppose. :shock:


Did you even watch it Marc? Try at 3mins in, where he sarcastically points out the "great job in 2001" Kubrick made of imitating walking on the moon.

Hell Razor5543
NOT Alistair or Simon
Posts: 10343
Joined: 01 Apr 2012, 09:47
x 943

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by Hell Razor5543 »

The only PROVEN conspiracy theory is that while there are no conspiracy THEORIES the conspiracy THEORISTS are collaborating to keep that fact covered up.

User avatar
Michel
Posts: 1750
Joined: 29 May 2017, 13:50
x 327

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by Michel »

GiveMeABreak wrote:
04 Jul 2019, 19:41
.... Couldn't fake it in a TV studio? So 2001 a Space Odyssey was just a figment of our imagination then I suppose. :shock:
I'm not sure of the relevance here. If you're suggesting that the moon walking scenes in 2001, or *any* moon scene in the film is like the real (yes, real) moon landings then www.specsavers.com is where you need to head next..

Nothing in 2001 is anything like real space travel. The book, yes, great.. the film.. drivel.

doctle
Posts: 862
Joined: 16 Oct 2014, 12:17
x 187

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by doctle »

Apart from the flat earth society I get a lot of my news from the Murdoch media and my TV interview viewing pleasure from Piers Morgan . If I need a second opinion I watch Fox news this helps to re-enforce my slack jawed yokel attitude to facts and reality. I haven't had an original thought since 1972 and I think Trump is the greatest thing since sliced bread, sliced bread having been invented prior to his birth. Homeopaths and chiropractors are the true medical experts and snake oil isn't just a Steve Earle song I bought it off the infowars website. When I was at school I was called Muggy I still don't know why!

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 19939
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
x 1949

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by GiveMeABreak »

Michel wrote:
04 Jul 2019, 21:13
GiveMeABreak wrote:
04 Jul 2019, 19:41
.... Couldn't fake it in a TV studio? So 2001 a Space Odyssey was just a figment of our imagination then I suppose. :shock:
I'm not sure of the relevance here. If you're suggesting that the moon walking scenes in 2001, or *any* moon scene in the film is like the real (yes, real) moon landings then www.specsavers.com is where you need to head next..

Nothing in 2001 is anything like real space travel. The book, yes, great.. the film.. drivel.
No, have not suggested htat anywhere - just that the front screen projection techniques were possibly used in the moonscape footage.

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 19939
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
x 1949

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by GiveMeABreak »

As in....Apollo 15 - 2 different pictures, yet in the third picture the two have been overlaid and can be seen to be identical.
Moon Back 1.PNG
Moon Back 2.PNG
Moon Back 3.PNG

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 19939
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
x 1949

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by GiveMeABreak »

There's been some research into the photographs by Oleg Oleynik, Ph.D.c, which can be seen here for those interested in the science bit:

https://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

doctle
Posts: 862
Joined: 16 Oct 2014, 12:17
x 187

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by doctle »

GiveMeABreak wrote:
04 Jul 2019, 22:27
There's been some research into the photographs by Oleg Oleynik, Ph.D.c, which can be seen here for those interested in the science bit:

https://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm


So he can manipulate images with photoshop but there was no photoshop in the 60's, 70's 80's 90's ....

MikeT
Posts: 4838
Joined: 11 Jun 2007, 16:17
x 186

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by MikeT »

We can put that bad science/math (and more besides!) to bed straight away.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-par ... n_landings

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 19939
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
x 1949

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by GiveMeABreak »

Yes but if you read the footer of the article - the mods refused to allow the wiki to be corrected - so they are propogating the incorrect science because they disagree with the findings.

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 19939
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
x 1949

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by GiveMeABreak »

doctle wrote:
04 Jul 2019, 23:05
GiveMeABreak wrote:
04 Jul 2019, 22:27
There's been some research into the photographs by Oleg Oleynik, Ph.D.c, which can be seen here for those interested in the science bit:

https://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm


So he can manipulate images with photoshop but there was no photoshop in the 60's, 70's 80's 90's ....
Of course not - your missing the point. He's using stereoscopic pictures to show distance. The other picture is showing you the 2001 ASO front projection lines which he has now drawn to show you - for which the effects were developed for the film - but it is easy to spot when looked at closely anyway. I don't think you read through it properly.

You prove to me they did land a man on the moon!

doctle
Posts: 862
Joined: 16 Oct 2014, 12:17
x 187

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by doctle »

Prove? The proof is on the moon and has been photographed stuff like the lunar modules and footprints can be seen. I believe the Apollo 11 flag is on the ground having been blown over by thrusters.
A secret is only a secret when only one person is aware of it. Tens of thousands of people have been involved in the American space program and I have never heard of even one of them saying it was faked. There were only a few people at Roswell and at least three of them have contradicted the official story. It's just not credible that up to 50000 people could keep a secret for 50 years.

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 19939
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
x 1949

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by GiveMeABreak »

Like I suggested - they didn't need to tell the "50000".

AJM C5
Donor 2019
Posts: 69
Joined: 28 Jun 2019, 15:32
x 8

Re: Manned Moon Landings - Did They Go? - Of Course They Did/n't

Unread post by AJM C5 »

It's tragicomedy that the wilfully ignorant simply refuse to acknowledge let alone analyse and apply a degree of critical thinking to the abundance of evidence indicating they never set foot on the moon in '69, but instead promulgate the myriad of falsities and half-baked lies to muddle-up and confuse instead. That last video of a supposed filmmaker lighting expert is classic in that respect, for although his logic on shadows for instance is good he doesn't apply it to the clearly set-up studios shots of several examples of multiple light sources on various objects from Nasa's Apollo 11! That's called cherry picking. I noticed the total absence of lunar dust on the lunar landers foot though, did you, or did the fake astronauts clean them up pre photo shoot perhaps. As for the rest of it, making statements based on totally false premises is par for the course in their world of disinformation, call it their pastime, being seen to stay onside with their masters and kept on the payroll. Hookers have more integrity than these people.

Fragile minds just can't t handle the truth, ducking and diving, choosing to be led by paid liars and other omnipresent fraudsters desperate to protect their simulated worlds of fakery, cos life is just more acceptable that way I guess.



Desperately sad people are given potentially great powers of thought and senses but instead choose to be told what to think and see instead.

Carry On Daydreaming.
Last edited by myglaren on 05 Jul 2019, 09:18, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: YouTube link