Well. Seeing as the invasion was totally illegal and based on a pack of lies anyway, he should have been left in power. I believe the situation in the region would have still been reasonably stable had be been left alone. He wasn't a pleasant chap, no, but is that any of our business?DickieG wrote:Just look at Iraq, Saddam was clearly a brutal dictator but you may bring out the question that maybe that is the only way of controlling the various factions within the country, I'm certainly not saying I agree with him but I do wonder that had he been left in power whether less blood would have been shednorthern_mike wrote:I would like it if they'd be intelligent enough to act on evidence they already have. The two gunmen in the Charlie Hebdo shootings were very well known to police, one had been inside, as had their nutcase Imam who was preaching violence 10 years ago.
Security fail. As was 9/11, and the London bombings. All could have probably been averted if the forces acted on information they had.
Oh, yes, of course it must have been because George W wanted the oil...
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk