A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

This is the place for posts that don't fit into any other category.

Moderator: RichardW

Hell Razor5543
NOT Alistair or Simon
Posts: 9413
Joined: 01 Apr 2012, 09:47
x 648

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by Hell Razor5543 » 06 Jul 2016, 13:10

I got to ride on the hovercraft from Ryde to Portsmouth and back. My cousin needed a replacement battery for her UPS (the power on the I-O-W could be a bit flaky), and the nearest place to get the right battery was in Portsmouth. Bumpy, fast, but fun.

User avatar
CitroJim
A very naughty boy
Posts: 41564
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 23:33
x 1033

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by CitroJim » 06 Jul 2016, 13:18

Ahh, the two words bumpy and fast used in the same sentence would keep me away from them then :( Fast and smooth I can cope with. Bumpy at any speed is right out!

RichardW
Forum Treasurer
Posts: 8854
Joined: 07 Aug 2002, 17:12
x 309

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by RichardW » 06 Jul 2016, 14:22

It'a alright on a nice calm day!

I think the Chunnel was the final straw for the cross channel Hovers. They were already struggling with running and maintenance costs - they had 4 huge gas turbines which were a bit thirsty, and compared to modern stuff (they were 30+ years old) they were cramped and noisy. Never had a chance to go on them - believe my parents went via Hover on their European honeymoon in 1971 - in a BMC 1100!

User avatar
white exec
Moderating Team
Posts: 4575
Joined: 21 Dec 2015, 13:46
x 613

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by white exec » 06 Jul 2016, 16:53

Travelled on Hoverspeed's Dover-Calais route many times, usually with a car. Richard is right: four Rolls-Royce Proteus turbines. Cramped, yes - bit like travelling on a very noisy bus - but impressively fast. Think they normally scooted across at about 55mph, laughing at anything up to a couple of metres of swell.

Running costs were high (maintenance, fuel, replacement rubber skirts (!)), and the escalation in fuel cost made everything worse. British Hovercraft Corporation (iirc), on the IoW, built four of them (type SRN4), but spares became difficult and first one, then two more were cannibalised to keep the last one going.

elma
Posts: 3745
Joined: 13 May 2007, 02:17
x 212

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by elma » 06 Jul 2016, 17:17

It was age and fuel consumption as far as I remember. They didn't get replaced because hovercrafts are quite inefficient. Someone did buy the old ones, I don't recall who or what for.

User avatar
bobins
Donor 2016
Posts: 2495
Joined: 05 Jul 2012, 18:07
x 530

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by bobins » 06 Jul 2016, 17:22

One of them still survives - it was in the news recently as the owners of the land it was stored on wanted the land back (I think there were issues due to non payment of rent). The Hovercraft Museum are trying to get it saved.

http://www.hovercraft-museum.org/

"The worlds biggest Hovercraft, SRN4, are stored onsite with the worlds biggest propellers, 21ft in diameter, with 30 tonnes of skirt apiece. They are not currently owned by the trust but we are working with the owners to secure the craft for the collection. Please see our news page for information about the appeal."

User avatar
CitroJim
A very naughty boy
Posts: 41564
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 23:33
x 1033

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by CitroJim » 06 Jul 2016, 17:50

Thanks all, most interesting :D

55mph on water is a cracking pace!

User avatar
daviemck2006
Donor 2016
Posts: 4783
Joined: 04 Dec 2010, 19:45
x 283

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by daviemck2006 » 06 Jul 2016, 17:54

I've been at 35mph on the water in a speedboat and it was worse than 140 in a xantia by far, about as bad as 95 in an allegro lol

Sent from my SM-T705 using Tapatalk

User avatar
Stickyfinger
Donor 2016
Posts: 9617
Joined: 28 Mar 2013, 22:05
x 638

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by Stickyfinger » 06 Jul 2016, 19:11

Speed Skiing

User avatar
van ordinaire
donor 2017
Posts: 2367
Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 14:45
x 213

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by van ordinaire » 07 Jul 2016, 09:18

My lasting memories were noise, vibration AND the almost overpowering stench of diesel. Fast they may have been - but seriously unpleasant!

User avatar
Sloppysod
donor 2017
Posts: 511
Joined: 23 May 2015, 23:35
x 38

Re: RE: Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by Sloppysod » 08 Jul 2016, 19:57

CitroJim wrote:Thanks all, most interesting :D

55mph on water is a cracking pace!
Technically, it was not on water, hovercrafts flew, I think you needed a pilots licence, not boat licence to drive one.

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

User avatar
myglaren
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 16273
Joined: 02 Mar 2008, 14:30
x 540

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by myglaren » 08 Jul 2016, 22:38

I reckon an Ekranoplan would be an interesting experience.


Hell Razor5543
NOT Alistair or Simon
Posts: 9413
Joined: 01 Apr 2012, 09:47
x 648

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by Hell Razor5543 » 08 Jul 2016, 22:40

Ah, the Caspian Sea Monster. It did rather scare the US Navy, with the potential for a VERY fast attack.

Gibbo2286
Posts: 3932
Joined: 08 Jun 2011, 18:04
x 509

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by Gibbo2286 » 09 Jul 2016, 10:18

I think that would be an easy target, a pile of bricks in its way would be enough. :)

Online
harryp
Donor 2016
Posts: 646
Joined: 07 May 2011, 16:03
x 28

Re: A nice pair but too easy for a whatsthisthen!

Post by harryp » 09 Jul 2016, 13:11

LOL, Floating bricks?

"55mph on water is a cracking pace"
I wish... ah well, crossed in 1971 or 2. "Flight" delayed for an hour due to swell. An incredably rough ride, which if I'm honest (as always :wink: ) I enjoyed :roll: . Down side was that myself and a German gentleman next to me seemed to be the only ones in our cabin not sick; yuk :roll: