Mandrake wrote:Of course they're not going to admit that the car required repairs before being sold as new...qprdude wrote:Also, as regards the "only three miles on the clock" so they couldn't have tested the car after the repair? I can't see where they have admitted to carrying out a repair, or have I missed something?
We can only infer it from the mismatched bumpers and obvious suspension/tracking faults that are too much of a coincidence for a brand new car... Unless it was assembled late on a Friday afternoon or the day before a strike I suppose...
Yes, I know all that. What I'm saying is, if there was fifty miles on the clock, it might infer a repair and test had been done on a "new" car, so giving the purchaser a reasonable doubt that the car had not been damaged and that the paint mismatch was a normal manufacturing occurence. The dealer might struggle to sell the car as new, with more miles on the clock, so he's never going to admit damage/repair/test, without an independent report.
I agree with the poster who said to bring it into the public domain but first give the dealer time to agree a refund. Once you bring it to the media, you might just have fired your best shot.