This it?Lifetime member of the 2.1TD fan club.
http://www.lacentrale.fr/photo-auto-occ ... annee=1992
Moderator: RichardW
This it?Lifetime member of the 2.1TD fan club.
No!
The vehicle mentioned refutes the otherwise fairly true statement that no cars of today are truly all bad.... this one is a REAL POS!
lolingram:
This it?
http://www.lacentrale.fr/photo-auto-occ ... annee=1992
Jim:
Fortunately, the only similarity between the 2.1TD object of my affection and the ISO container on wheels you've depicted there is the colour
I'm suprised such a "small" engine as a 2.1 can propel that particular vehicle. The picture says it's a "Limited" What does that mean exactly? Limited performance? Limited appeal? Limited styling? Whatever, my interest in such a device is a certainly limited
Andrew, we really must look at yours as there must be something the matter. Gareth's in my ownership was not at all bad and on a run it would do high 30s. I'm sure my red one is even better than that, especially when she drinks V-Power. 160 miles yesterday on a 1/4 of a tank.andmcit wrote: The worst Citroen on fuel ever? (I don't drive anything else! Ever!).
My Activa; it's truly beyond Oliver Reed proportions, so bad I've gone into
denial and won't actually face up to how much it uses so I don't depress
myself, but bad enough to make me check for leaks...
The 2.1 in the Cherokee was certainly not a Citroen engine... apparently it was French though, a Renault....citrojim wrote: No!
Fortunately, the only similarity between the 2.1TD object of my affection and the ISO container on wheels you've depicted there is the colour
I'm suprised such a "small" engine as a 2.1 can propel that particular vehicle. The picture says it's a "Limited" What does that mean exactly? Limited performance? Limited appeal? Limited styling? Whatever, my interest in such a device is a certainly limited