I just want to see if we might agree

I can understand all of that Davie, especially the fuel consumptiondaviemck2006 wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 14:24 Not being able to bypass the immobiliser, the length of time it took for the suspension to rise. It always settled a bit and took about 30 seconds from starting it untill the stop lights went off and it could be driven. The fuel consumption.
daviemck2006 wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 16:46 I’ve just thought of another thing that pissed me off, every time I ordered something for the activa I got bits for a 2.0 16v which is a different thing and most bits are different between the two.
Hell Razor5543 wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 17:56 I take it there is a nice dollop of copper slip grease that has now been spun into the threads?
daviemck2006 wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 12:37 Im sure Zel will enjoy the activa, although I could see it being more like his saab than anything else.
CitroJim wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 13:33 Davie, can you be a little more specific about what did your head in on the Activa?
I just want to see if we might agree![]()
daviemck2006 wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 14:24 Not being able to bypass the immobiliser, the length of time it took for the suspension to rise. The fuel consumption. I never bettered 24mpg. That were the main things.
CitroJim wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 15:58 The fuel consumption can be OK if driven a little conservatively - I have had 39mpg out of one and regularly I could see 35mpg...
Michel wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 23:38CitroJim wrote: 20 Oct 2017, 15:58 The fuel consumption can be OK if driven a little conservatively - I have had 39mpg out of one and regularly I could see 35mpg...
If anyone but you else stated this about an Activa, I'd call them a liar or ask them if it was rolling downhill with the engine off..