1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Moderator: RichardW
- white exec
- Moderating Team
- Posts: 7445
- Joined: 21 Dec 2015, 12:46
- Location: Sayalonga, Malaga, Spain
- My Cars: 1996 XM 2.5TD Exclusive hatch RHD
1992 BX19D Millesime hatch LHD
previously 1989 BX19RD, 1998 ZX 1.9D auto, 2001 Xantia 1.8i auto
and lots of Rovers before that: 1935 Ten, 1947 Sixteen, 1960 P5 3-litre, 1966 P6 2000, 1972 P6 2000TC, and 1975 P6B 3500S - x 1752
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Wonder what they mean by "low inertia disc"? Surely not the tiny reduction in mass of the friction plate?
Or are they referring to the flywheel itself?
You've been lucky with DMFs. I haven't.
RAV4 first one lasted 60k mi, and its 'improved' genuine Toyota replacement lasted another 24k mi. Both shredded their friction plates as the flywheels developed rotational slop. And we drive gently, having never worn out a clutch since starting driving somewhere about the middle of the last century.
Modern clutchplate material really doesn't help. Resin+glassfibre string is no durability-substitute for the old asbestos compound, although obviously the latter is gladly gone. Wonder what the military use?
Or are they referring to the flywheel itself?
You've been lucky with DMFs. I haven't.
RAV4 first one lasted 60k mi, and its 'improved' genuine Toyota replacement lasted another 24k mi. Both shredded their friction plates as the flywheels developed rotational slop. And we drive gently, having never worn out a clutch since starting driving somewhere about the middle of the last century.
Modern clutchplate material really doesn't help. Resin+glassfibre string is no durability-substitute for the old asbestos compound, although obviously the latter is gladly gone. Wonder what the military use?
Chris
- myglaren
- Forum Admin Team
- Posts: 25477
- Joined: 02 Mar 2008, 13:30
- Location: Washington
- My Cars: Mazda 6
Ooops.
Previously:
2009 Honda Civic :(
C5, C5, Xantia, BX, GS, Visa.
R4, R11TXE, R14, R30TX - x 4922
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
My first one - in the estate - was changed along with the clutch at about 130,000 miles due to a mis-diagnosis - the fault was an injector.
While it was still working OK it was near the end of it's life.
Current one seems OK at >211,000 miles of much abuse.
While it was still working OK it was near the end of it's life.
Current one seems OK at >211,000 miles of much abuse.
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Can you explain what you mean by "treating with respect". Does it mean avoiding low rev driving?Bob L'eponge wrote:white exec wrote:
I don't think that DMF's are flawed in concept, and in my experience can run fine for high mileages (the one on my wife's car has done 240,000 km, and the one in my Fiat was fine at 120,000 miles when the clutch release bearing went) but they probably do need treating with respect.
Xantia Estate 1999 2.0 HDI 110
C5 2005 2.0 HDI 138
Nissan Leaf 2018 40Kwh
C5 2005 2.0 HDI 138
Nissan Leaf 2018 40Kwh
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: 25 Feb 2013, 13:47
- Location:
- My Cars:
- x 8
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
From what I have seen the main thing is to avoid over-heating the clutch (for example by riding it) as this damages the rubber buffers inside the flywheel.aneesh84 wrote: Can you explain what you mean by "treating with respect". Does it mean avoiding low rev driving?
- white exec
- Moderating Team
- Posts: 7445
- Joined: 21 Dec 2015, 12:46
- Location: Sayalonga, Malaga, Spain
- My Cars: 1996 XM 2.5TD Exclusive hatch RHD
1992 BX19D Millesime hatch LHD
previously 1989 BX19RD, 1998 ZX 1.9D auto, 2001 Xantia 1.8i auto
and lots of Rovers before that: 1935 Ten, 1947 Sixteen, 1960 P5 3-litre, 1966 P6 2000, 1972 P6 2000TC, and 1975 P6B 3500S - x 1752
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Sometimes easier said than done. Many vehicles now have quite a high reverse gear (compared to 20+ years ago), and this has been noted as making hill-starts in reverse quite difficult without higher engine revs and wear on the clutch. Couple this with the relative delicacy of modern clutch linings, and throw in a less-than-new DMF, and it is all too easy to overheat a clutch, even in expert hands. The appalling smell of burnt resin is the instant giveaway.
If you unlucky enough to have a sloping driveway, which you need to reverse up, then this doesn't help.
If you unlucky enough to have a sloping driveway, which you need to reverse up, then this doesn't help.
Chris
- jsp
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 04 Dec 2014, 02:05
- Location: Netherlands
- My Cars: AX 3x 10E 1.4 GTI 5drs 1.0i
CX 2x GTI turbo
ID 19 1960
Now:
1960 ID 19
1984 CX GTI Turbo 1
1987 CX GTI Turbo 2
1987 AX 10E Pino
1994 AX 1.4 5dr TGS GTI
1994 AX 1.0 3dr Escapade
1996 AX 1.1 3dr spot Burgundy
1996 AX 1.1 5dr Verte
2003 peugeot 206 xs leather with auto A/C - x 12
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
HDI have short gearing 1st and reverse to compensate it.
My Citroens update:
http://www.frenchcarforum.co.uk/forum/v ... 14&t=50070
http://www.frenchcarforum.co.uk/forum/v ... 14&t=50070
- Romzi
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 10 Dec 2012, 14:40
- Location: Slovenia (Ljubljana)
- My Cars: C5 break II, 2.0 HDI
- x 3
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Bob L'eponge wrote: ↑31 Jul 2016, 08:33 It's not so much that the manufacturers look to sell engines that are 'harsher', rather DMF's have been a response to the increased peak torque values that a modern common-rail diesel engine can produce. (Which I suppose could be seen to be the same thing, although most would see a 'harsh' engine as being a negative thing, but increased torque as being a positive.)
So basically, we get this high torque engine which requires DMF, but are not alloweed to use that torque to prevent damagaing DMF. This is ridiculous.I don't think that DMF's are flawed in concept, and in my experience can run fine for high mileages (the one on my wife's car has done 240,000 km, and the one in my Fiat was fine at 120,000 miles when the clutch release bearing went) but they probably do need treating with respect.
Sorry Bob, it's not your fault, I'm just reading this sort of contradictionary info over and over again....
Now about me.... Citroen C5 break, MK2, year 2004, 2.0 HDI.
The complete clutch was replaced 4 years ago (Luk DMF repset).
Just out of clutch warranty (1 year) , after only a little bit over 20.000 km (not miles!), the clutch began to slip.
Sometimes, it was slipping, sometimes not. It was worse in winter, and better in summer, but in all this time, it was getting oin my nervers.
The engine is not remapped, or nothing else is changed. I do tow our caravan occasionally (900 kg), but....
This is why I bought this (high peak torque diesel powered) car in the first place.
But I am not heavy user, also the caravan is way beyond alowed towing weight for this car.
Anyway, now, after about 100.000 km, these crappy clutch is finished. It's slipping all the time.
Are there any cons about Valeo 4p kit, except a little more noise and vibrations from the engine?
And, If somene knows: is there eny info about max Torque, thid clutch can withstand?
BTW, this HDI does not like driving in low end revs, it gets normally useful and alive at about 1800-2000 rpm, so what's the point using DMF anyway?
My VIN is: VF7**************[VIN obfuscated, can be read by forum staff]
If i am correct, the right kit for my car is Valeo 835068.
- white exec
- Moderating Team
- Posts: 7445
- Joined: 21 Dec 2015, 12:46
- Location: Sayalonga, Malaga, Spain
- My Cars: 1996 XM 2.5TD Exclusive hatch RHD
1992 BX19D Millesime hatch LHD
previously 1989 BX19RD, 1998 ZX 1.9D auto, 2001 Xantia 1.8i auto
and lots of Rovers before that: 1935 Ten, 1947 Sixteen, 1960 P5 3-litre, 1966 P6 2000, 1972 P6 2000TC, and 1975 P6B 3500S - x 1752
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
I went through two DMFs on our RAV4 2.0 D4D, both genuine Toyota, the second one "improved". One lasted 60k km, the second just 24k km. Both developed massive backlash, broke up, and destroyed their friction plates.
Car now has a Blueprint 4p kit (Valeo one not available) and has run from 80k to 220k km without issue. Hill starts and reverse hills never simpler, and achievable without the need to over-rev. Worked for me, but then not a C5.
Only difference in friction plates is that DMF ones are unsprung (plain centre), while SMF ones contain the conventional short springs.
Car now has a Blueprint 4p kit (Valeo one not available) and has run from 80k to 220k km without issue. Hill starts and reverse hills never simpler, and achievable without the need to over-rev. Worked for me, but then not a C5.
Only difference in friction plates is that DMF ones are unsprung (plain centre), while SMF ones contain the conventional short springs.
Chris
- Romzi
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 10 Dec 2012, 14:40
- Location: Slovenia (Ljubljana)
- My Cars: C5 break II, 2.0 HDI
- x 3
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Thanks.
I would really like to read some impression (review) from someone with the same car (or similar car with the same engine and transmission, like P 407). I read some horror stories about broken shafts and so on, but never from the owner directly.
I would really like to read some impression (review) from someone with the same car (or similar car with the same engine and transmission, like P 407). I read some horror stories about broken shafts and so on, but never from the owner directly.
- white exec
- Moderating Team
- Posts: 7445
- Joined: 21 Dec 2015, 12:46
- Location: Sayalonga, Malaga, Spain
- My Cars: 1996 XM 2.5TD Exclusive hatch RHD
1992 BX19D Millesime hatch LHD
previously 1989 BX19RD, 1998 ZX 1.9D auto, 2001 Xantia 1.8i auto
and lots of Rovers before that: 1935 Ten, 1947 Sixteen, 1960 P5 3-litre, 1966 P6 2000, 1972 P6 2000TC, and 1975 P6B 3500S - x 1752
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Lots of rumours about broken bits, but rarely any first-hand/verified reports, as you say.
One interesting question is whether the same engine and output shafting was ever produced with SMF as standard (the RAV4's D4D was) for other models, which ought to indicate that its design around a conventional flywheel was sound.
In your position, the choice is another DMF or an SMF 4p conversion (far less expensive), and I think I would be going for the latter. If it turned out that it wasn't good enough - eg unacceptable vibration - then another DMF would always remain an option, and the lost cost wouldn't have been too bad.
Valeo produce some well-renowned components, and they chose long ago to produce and market SMF alternative (4p) kits for all sorts of makes, and have continued to do this for some years. (One of theirs wasn't available for Toyota D4Ds 'for commercial reasons'; it seemed this was because they were supplying Toyota with OE DMF equipment, and so couldn't also offer an alternative.)
One interesting question is whether the same engine and output shafting was ever produced with SMF as standard (the RAV4's D4D was) for other models, which ought to indicate that its design around a conventional flywheel was sound.
In your position, the choice is another DMF or an SMF 4p conversion (far less expensive), and I think I would be going for the latter. If it turned out that it wasn't good enough - eg unacceptable vibration - then another DMF would always remain an option, and the lost cost wouldn't have been too bad.
Valeo produce some well-renowned components, and they chose long ago to produce and market SMF alternative (4p) kits for all sorts of makes, and have continued to do this for some years. (One of theirs wasn't available for Toyota D4Ds 'for commercial reasons'; it seemed this was because they were supplying Toyota with OE DMF equipment, and so couldn't also offer an alternative.)
Chris
- GiveMeABreak
- Forum Admin Team
- Posts: 37408
- Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
- Location: West Wales
- My Cars: C3 Aircross SUV HDi Flair Peperoncino Red (The Chili Hornet)
C5 X7 2.0 HDi Exclusive Mativoire Beige (The Golden Hornet)
C3 1.6 HDi Exclusive Aluminium Grey (The Silver Hornet)
C5 MK II 2.0 HDi Exclusive Obsidian Black
C5 MK I 2.0 HDi SX Wicked Red
Xantia S2 2.0 HDi SX Hermes Red
C15 Romahome White
XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Emerald Green Pearlescent
XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Polar White
XM 2.0 SX Polar White
CX 20 Polar White
GS 1220 Geranium Red
CX 2.4 Prestige C-Matic Nevada Beige
GS 1000 Cedreat Yellow - x 5741
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Don't ignore the possibility of a crankshaft oil seal failure - that happened to me after changing the clutch and DMF after slipping (DMF was badly worn - previous owner towed with the C5 X7). Then about 16k miles later slipping started again - took it back and the oil from the crank seal has leaked onto the clutch and contaminated the friction plates - had the seal done and the clutch replaced and has been fine since.
There is no data on the max. torque that the clutches take - but I can tell you they are different for the various engines and whether they have DPFs or not and ditto for the DMFs - so would have different tolerances based on that alone I suspect.
There is no data on the max. torque that the clutches take - but I can tell you they are different for the various engines and whether they have DPFs or not and ditto for the DMFs - so would have different tolerances based on that alone I suspect.
Please Don't PM Me For Technical Help
Marc
Marc
- white exec
- Moderating Team
- Posts: 7445
- Joined: 21 Dec 2015, 12:46
- Location: Sayalonga, Malaga, Spain
- My Cars: 1996 XM 2.5TD Exclusive hatch RHD
1992 BX19D Millesime hatch LHD
previously 1989 BX19RD, 1998 ZX 1.9D auto, 2001 Xantia 1.8i auto
and lots of Rovers before that: 1935 Ten, 1947 Sixteen, 1960 P5 3-litre, 1966 P6 2000, 1972 P6 2000TC, and 1975 P6B 3500S - x 1752
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
Towing - yes - DMF pretty much unsuited to full-sized towing, so another reason to call it a day.
Too much "wind up", and poorer clutch control - especially in reverse or on a hill; just what you don't need.
Too much "wind up", and poorer clutch control - especially in reverse or on a hill; just what you don't need.
Chris
- Romzi
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 10 Dec 2012, 14:40
- Location: Slovenia (Ljubljana)
- My Cars: C5 break II, 2.0 HDI
- x 3
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
I am quite sure, it was replaced last time the clutch was replaced.GiveMeABreak wrote: ↑08 Mar 2020, 10:49 Don't ignore the possibility of a crankshaft oil seal failure - that happened to me after changing the clutch and DMF after slipping (DMF was badly worn - previous owner towed with the C5 X7).
Now, slipage is getting worse almost every day.
Will get back to report what I have decided and make some short review if i will go SMF path..
- Romzi
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 10 Dec 2012, 14:40
- Location: Slovenia (Ljubljana)
- My Cars: C5 break II, 2.0 HDI
- x 3
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
I've got some info from the dealers in Slovenia, and mostly opinion is, Valeo 4p for this setup is no-go.
I am more and more sure we will use new OEM DMF plus Sachs Performance Clutch kit (https://www.sachsperformance.com/en/clu ... 00951837-s).
It is quite reliable solution, but quite expensive.
Are there any delaers fro this, or only online buy from above webpage?
I am more and more sure we will use new OEM DMF plus Sachs Performance Clutch kit (https://www.sachsperformance.com/en/clu ... 00951837-s).
It is quite reliable solution, but quite expensive.
Are there any delaers fro this, or only online buy from above webpage?
Re: 1.6hdi clutch flywheel or solid ??
What are the reported problems with valeo 4p? I generally had heard of good feedback about them.Romzi wrote: ↑10 Mar 2020, 14:41 I've got some info from the dealers in Slovenia, and mostly opinion is, Valeo 4p for this setup is no-go.
I am more and more sure we will use new OEM DMF plus Sachs Performance Clutch kit (https://www.sachsperformance.com/en/clu ... 00951837-s).
It is quite reliable solution, but quite expensive.
Are there any delaers fro this, or only online buy from above webpage?
Xantia Estate 1999 2.0 HDI 110
C5 2005 2.0 HDI 138
Nissan Leaf 2018 40Kwh
C5 2005 2.0 HDI 138
Nissan Leaf 2018 40Kwh