XANTIA SPHERES

This is the Forum for all your Citroen Technical Questions, Problems or Advice.

Moderator: RichardW

Post Reply
bill hughes
Posts: 229
Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 13:22
Location: West Sussex
My Cars: 1994 xantia 1.9 tdi sold on and still going strong 2ooo xantia 2.0hdi estate 1998 Renault megane 1.4
x 2

XANTIA SPHERES

Post by bill hughes »

Hi all can anyone tell me if my 1994 xantia 1.9 td would have hydractive suspension or not, and are the spheres inter-changeable and is there any way of telling which is which by just looking at them many thanks
User avatar
Mandrake
Posts: 8618
Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 17:23
Location: North Lanarkshire, UK
My Cars:
x 666

Re: XANTIA SPHERES

Post by Mandrake »

The easiest way to be certain is to lift the bonnet and measure the diameter of the feed pipe to the top of the front suspension struts.

If it's Hydractive they will be 10mm in diameter and then join to a large diameter flexible hose that is bolted to the side wing.

If it's not Hydractive the pipe will be 3.5mm in steel only with no rubber section. Below is an example of the small size pipe on a car that is NOT Hydractive:

Image

The strut spheres are not interchangeable between Hydractive and non-Hydractive.
Simon

1997 Xantia S1 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive in Silex Grey
2016 Nissan Leaf Tekna 30kWh in White

2011 Peugeot Ion Full Electric in Silver
1977 G Special 1129cc LHD
1978 CX 2400
1997 Xantia S1 2.0i Auto VSX
1998 Xantia S2 3.0 V6 Auto Exclusive
bill hughes
Posts: 229
Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 13:22
Location: West Sussex
My Cars: 1994 xantia 1.9 tdi sold on and still going strong 2ooo xantia 2.0hdi estate 1998 Renault megane 1.4
x 2

Re: XANTIA SPHERES

Post by bill hughes »

Many thanks mandrake, it seems mine is non-hydactive
bill hughes
Posts: 229
Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 13:22
Location: West Sussex
My Cars: 1994 xantia 1.9 tdi sold on and still going strong 2ooo xantia 2.0hdi estate 1998 Renault megane 1.4
x 2

Re: XANTIA SPHERES

Post by bill hughes »

As a matter of interest mandrake, I phoned Pleidaes on 01487 831239 and they could not have been more helpful, they said the difference between the two spheres is that the small hole in the standard one is about 1.5mm and less than 1mm in the hydractive one so I can check the new ones before taking the old ones off, very helpful
Northern_Mike

Post by Northern_Mike »

A 1994 TD won't be hydractive, unless it's a VSX. I'm not even sure they made the VSX that early.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
bill hughes
Posts: 229
Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 13:22
Location: West Sussex
My Cars: 1994 xantia 1.9 tdi sold on and still going strong 2ooo xantia 2.0hdi estate 1998 Renault megane 1.4
x 2

Re: XANTIA SPHERES

Post by bill hughes »

Thanks northern Mike, it was your posting that gave me Pleidaes's phone number, I have now established that my xantia is non-hydractive, Citroen forum does it again!
User avatar
CitroJim
A very naughty boy
Posts: 49658
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 23:33
Location: Paggers
My Cars: Bluebell the AX, Polly the C3 Picasso, Pix the Nissan Pixo, Propel the duathlon bike, TCR Pro the road bike and Fuji the TT bike...
x 6204
Contact:

Re:

Post by CitroJim »

northern_mike wrote:A 1994 TD won't be hydractive, unless it's a VSX. I'm not even sure they made the VSX that early.
They did :-D There were VSX sinkers with Hydractive. You know that blue Xantia model on my table Mike? That's a very early sinker Hydractive...
.
Jim

Runner, cyclist, time triallist, duathlete, Citroen AX fan and the CCC Citroenian 'From A to Z' Columnist...
aneesh84
Posts: 366
Joined: 31 Jul 2011, 22:29
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
My Cars:
x 28

Re: XANTIA SPHERES

Post by aneesh84 »

bill hughes wrote:Hi all can anyone tell me if my 1994 xantia 1.9 td would have hydractive suspension or not, and are the spheres inter-changeable and is there any way of telling which is which by just looking at them many thanks
The easiest way is to check if it has a sport switch next to the hand brake. If yes then its a hydractive.
Xantia Estate 1999 2.0 HDI 110
C5 2005 2.0 HDI 138
Nissan Leaf 2018 40Kwh
Post Reply