Aviation Systems

rg · Post by rg » 06 Oct 2003, 15:21

A pukka aircraft engineer on another forum said that there are strong similarities between aircraft hydraulic/electric systems and the XM's systems.
(Probabbly not in build quality, though...)

)
rg

rg · Post by rg » 06 Oct 2003, 15:23

Sorry folks.
Mr Moderator, please add this to the "Aircraft Engine" thread.
Thanks
rg

jeremy · Post by **jeremy** » 06 Oct 2003, 19:19

Are aircraft technicians any better at finding the problems than factory trained Citroen dealers?
jeremy

BonceChops · Post by **BonceChops** » 06 Oct 2003, 19:43

Do Citroen train dealers? [:D][:D][:D]

AndersDK · Post by **AndersDK** » 06 Oct 2003, 19:48

YES -
Citroen dealers train their mechanics - as part of the dealership program.
Aircraft technicians better ?
- they certainly get a much deeper/detailed education [:D]

rg · Post by rg » 06 Oct 2003, 20:04

Maintenance Log Entry:
Crew; - "Aircraft lands heavy on autoland system"
Engineer:- "This aircraft not fitted with autoland"
rg

benj · Post by **benj** » 16 Oct 2003, 16:27

its a five year apprentciceship to be an aircraft technican/engineer to my level. (spelling not a criteria!) citroen hydraulics and aircraft systems?
not so much chalk and cheese , more like;
sega master system/playstation 2

rg · Post by rg » 17 Oct 2003, 01:00

The comparison was actually made by a 35-year veteran of aircraft engineering on another forum. And the point was "the principle" (electro-hydaulics, sensors, struts, etc) rather than the details.
rg

benj · Post by **benj** » 17 Oct 2003, 11:18

the same "principle" applies for a million applications

bencowell · Post by **bencowell** » 18 Oct 2003, 15:53

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by benj</i>

not so much chalk and cheese , more like;
sega master system/playstation 2
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Which one is the Citroen?