Eolys?

This is the Forum for all your Citroen Technical Questions, Problems or Advice.

Moderator: RichardW

bkod
Posts: 24
Joined: 09 Apr 2018, 19:28
Location: Aberdeenshire
My Cars: 2009 C-crosser 2.2hdi Exclusive '09
2005 C4 1.6i
x 2

Re: Eolys?

Post by bkod » 13 Apr 2018, 21:18

1500 LZ is a part number for old pouch. As far as I know it's out of stock, it was about £150 at Citroen.
New part number is 9678027980. It's over £350. According to citroen service instruction you are supposed to use proper part number as replacement.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
0x

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 8507
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
Location: West Wales
My Cars: '09 C5 X7 2.0 HDi Exclusive Mativoire Beige (The Golden Hornet)
'07 C3 1.6 HDi Exclusive Aluminium Grey (The Silver Hornet)
Past:
'76 GS 1000 Cedreat Yellow (yuk)
'79 GS 1220 Geranium Red
'78 CX 2.4 Turbo Prestige C-Matic Nevada Beige
'84 CX 20 Polar White
'90 XM 2.0 SX Polar White
'93 XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Polar White
'94 XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Emerald Green Pearlescent
'98 C15 Romahome White
'99 Xantia 2.0 HDi SX Hermes Red
'01 C5 2.0 HDi SX Wicked Red
'05 C5 2.0 HDi Exclusive Obsidian Black
x 622

Re: Eolys?

Post by GiveMeABreak » 13 Apr 2018, 21:24

Yes but the £150 kit was a 1.1 litre kit.
The other one is 3.3 Litres, so 3 times the price.
0x
Marc

bkod
Posts: 24
Joined: 09 Apr 2018, 19:28
Location: Aberdeenshire
My Cars: 2009 C-crosser 2.2hdi Exclusive '09
2005 C4 1.6i
x 2

Re: Eolys?

Post by bkod » 13 Apr 2018, 21:27

0x

bkod
Posts: 24
Joined: 09 Apr 2018, 19:28
Location: Aberdeenshire
My Cars: 2009 C-crosser 2.2hdi Exclusive '09
2005 C4 1.6i
x 2

Re: Eolys?

Post by bkod » 13 Apr 2018, 21:34

After replacing the pouch do you just tell ecu you replaced it or you type in the volume of the pouch you put in?
How does it work like in diagbox?
If there's different sizes of the pouch there must be way to tell ecu what is put in.
0x

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 8507
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
Location: West Wales
My Cars: '09 C5 X7 2.0 HDi Exclusive Mativoire Beige (The Golden Hornet)
'07 C3 1.6 HDi Exclusive Aluminium Grey (The Silver Hornet)
Past:
'76 GS 1000 Cedreat Yellow (yuk)
'79 GS 1220 Geranium Red
'78 CX 2.4 Turbo Prestige C-Matic Nevada Beige
'84 CX 20 Polar White
'90 XM 2.0 SX Polar White
'93 XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Polar White
'94 XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Emerald Green Pearlescent
'98 C15 Romahome White
'99 Xantia 2.0 HDi SX Hermes Red
'01 C5 2.0 HDi SX Wicked Red
'05 C5 2.0 HDi Exclusive Obsidian Black
x 622

Re: Eolys?

Post by GiveMeABreak » 10 May 2018, 16:36

I can't say for the pouch versions - as that might be just as simple as telling it that it has been replaced, as the pouch should be a standard size.
0x
Marc

bkod
Posts: 24
Joined: 09 Apr 2018, 19:28
Location: Aberdeenshire
My Cars: 2009 C-crosser 2.2hdi Exclusive '09
2005 C4 1.6i
x 2

Re: Eolys?

Post by bkod » 21 May 2018, 11:28

GiveMeABreak wrote:
13 Apr 2018, 21:24
Yes but the £150 kit was a 1.1 litre kit.
The other one is 3.3 Litres, so 3 times the price.


You mentioned two sizes of pouches in one of your previous posts...
0x

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 8507
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
Location: West Wales
My Cars: '09 C5 X7 2.0 HDi Exclusive Mativoire Beige (The Golden Hornet)
'07 C3 1.6 HDi Exclusive Aluminium Grey (The Silver Hornet)
Past:
'76 GS 1000 Cedreat Yellow (yuk)
'79 GS 1220 Geranium Red
'78 CX 2.4 Turbo Prestige C-Matic Nevada Beige
'84 CX 20 Polar White
'90 XM 2.0 SX Polar White
'93 XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Polar White
'94 XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Emerald Green Pearlescent
'98 C15 Romahome White
'99 Xantia 2.0 HDi SX Hermes Red
'01 C5 2.0 HDi SX Wicked Red
'05 C5 2.0 HDi Exclusive Obsidian Black
x 622

Re: Eolys?

Post by GiveMeABreak » 21 May 2018, 12:43

Yes, I meant standard sizes - but as I said, I have the tank - not pouches. It may very well be the same procedure for the Pouch as it is for liquid top-up. The instructions should be listed within the procedure regardless.
0x
Marc

RichardW
Forum Treasurer
Posts: 8228
Joined: 07 Aug 2002, 17:12
Location: United Kingdom
My Cars: C4 Grand Picassos:
MK1 '08 1.6 HDi 110
MK2 '17 1.6 BlueHDi 120
x 208

Re: Eolys?

Post by RichardW » 21 May 2018, 20:23

I think the later pouch is more expensive by virtue of the additive rather than the volume - data suggests that it will use >3l over 75k, so a 3.3l pouch seems about right (not sure where you saw the volume, Marc?). Certainly when I did our C4 Picasso pouch there would have been no room for a larger pouch in the housing! I did consider having a go at refilling it, but got a pouch for about £120 so didn't bother - and when I got it out it was leaking so just as well! When replaced it just asked me if I had fitted a new one and that was it, no questions about volume. Similar when I put the Lexia on crapday's X7 - although that is a tank, it didn't ask for the volume (although the amount it then reported in the tank was significantly less than Gary had added!). It shouldn't be too hard to drop the tank out and have a look to see if the bag is intact, and how much is left to determine if it's worth having a bash at putting a litre or 2 in it - if you're not doing that many miles it will last a good while.
0x
Richard W
His and Hers C4 Grand Picassos!

User avatar
GiveMeABreak
Forum Admin Team
Posts: 8507
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 19:38
Location: West Wales
My Cars: '09 C5 X7 2.0 HDi Exclusive Mativoire Beige (The Golden Hornet)
'07 C3 1.6 HDi Exclusive Aluminium Grey (The Silver Hornet)
Past:
'76 GS 1000 Cedreat Yellow (yuk)
'79 GS 1220 Geranium Red
'78 CX 2.4 Turbo Prestige C-Matic Nevada Beige
'84 CX 20 Polar White
'90 XM 2.0 SX Polar White
'93 XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Polar White
'94 XM 2.0 Turbo Prestige Emerald Green Pearlescent
'98 C15 Romahome White
'99 Xantia 2.0 HDi SX Hermes Red
'01 C5 2.0 HDi SX Wicked Red
'05 C5 2.0 HDi Exclusive Obsidian Black
x 622

Re: Eolys?

Post by GiveMeABreak » 21 May 2018, 22:26

RichardW wrote:
21 May 2018, 20:23
I think the later pouch is more expensive by virtue of the additive rather than the volume - data suggests that it will use >3l over 75k, so a 3.3l pouch seems about right (not sure where you saw the volume, Marc?).


9678027980 Is the reference the OP linked to Richard, and if you look closely on the package, bottom left of the photo below, you can just see the 3.3l. You have to be an eagle eyed Eddie to see it otherwise :-D
E2974F15-7300-4C90-AD23-3F23BC8E474B.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
0x
Marc