Guys, there's been a bit of misreading here. It's the MAP I bypassed. Not the MAF or the FAP. I just pulled it out of it's hose in the top of the intercooler, left it connected and plugged the hose.
T
38mpg at 70mph. 2004 C5 estate 110bhp
Moderator: RichardW
-
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 07:24
- Location: West Sussex U.K
- My Cars:
- x 9
Re: 38mpg at 70mph. 2004 C5 estate 110bhp
Opps!!! Dear dear I fear old age and dyslexia are I fear creeping up on me
I would have to confess that I mentally confused MAP and MAF because I was thinking about something else MAF related but how that ended up as FAP I dread to think......
Interesting that the ECU doesn't appear to detect the anomaly between an engine turning at say 2K revs and the MAP sensor only indicating ambient pressure, I would have expected the firmware to have a background routine monitoring sensor inputs against other parameters as a check that the indicated values are not wildly in error.
cachaciero
I would have to confess that I mentally confused MAP and MAF because I was thinking about something else MAF related but how that ended up as FAP I dread to think......
Interesting that the ECU doesn't appear to detect the anomaly between an engine turning at say 2K revs and the MAP sensor only indicating ambient pressure, I would have expected the firmware to have a background routine monitoring sensor inputs against other parameters as a check that the indicated values are not wildly in error.
cachaciero
2006 Toyota Prius T Spirit
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC
2001 2.2 C5 Exclusive SE
1996 XM 2.1 TD Auto VSX
1995 XM 2.1 TD Auto SX died @ 140K
1987 CX 2.5 Gti Turbo II dead
1984 Ford Scorpio
1981 CX 2.4 Pallas Auto
Renault 21
1220 GS Club
Rover P6 2000TC