HDi engine and stop-go driving...

This is the Forum for all your Citroen Technical Questions, Problems or Advice.

Moderator: RichardW

h2ocooler
Posts: 275
Joined: 01 Aug 2006, 00:35
Location: Chatham, Kent. UK
My Cars:

Post by h2ocooler »

As the fitter said to me, diesels are not designed to run as slow revs all the time and should be loaded to keep them clear, modern driving isnt good for them.
Even the manual on my HDi says it needs to be run at over 3000rpm to heat the particulate filter up to burn off temp, in top (4th on my auto) that is over 100 so i have to lock it into 3rd to do it (once a week with out fail)

When i think back to the day of the old XR2's, a woman next door to me had one (XR2) but it never went above 40mph, she was complaining one day how bad it was running, I had it for a week when she went away and thrashed it, when she got back and drove it she came to pay me for doing a tune up on it commenting on how well it was running now, after i told her how i did it she gave it to me to thrash each time it started to choke up.

It DOES do an engine good to be run hard, cleans the cobwebs out as the oldies used to say.
Rob
2005 Renault Laguna II Sports Tourer Initiale 2.0 Turbo Auto Estate
2003 Citroen C8 2.2Hdi Exclusive Captains Chair
2007 Renault Megane 1.6VVT Cabriolet Coupe Dynamique
02 C5 2.2 Hdi Exclusive Auto Estate (my Dads) DE_FAPPED
lolingram
RIP 2010
Posts: 550
Joined: 27 Dec 2006, 07:59
Location: France
My Cars:
x 1
Contact:

Post by lolingram »

Rather than taking the EGR out of the system, a very well respected and knowlegable Diesel fitter near me parted with this little gem to a mate of mine with a coked up and very smokey transit.
Once a week at least take a diesel car on the motorway/dual carrageway, and hold it in 2nd or 3rd gear at the rev limiter for at least half a mile to a mile, it WONT damage the engine, that is what the limiter is for, i had a diesel escort van at the time and used to cane the ass off it all the time, looking at the exhaust there was very little soot in mine, my mates transit however was coated with 2-3mm as he treated it like a baby, always short shifting and only ever going 55mph max, he took the advice and i looked a few weeks later and most of the soot had gone, he also said it was running much better with hardly and smoke.
With turbo diesels if they dont get to rev out all they do is produce soot from incomplete combustion with the EGR valve making it worse (it recycles exhaust gas to reduce the amount of O2 in the cylinder charge to reduce emmissions)
DO make sure your engine is well maintained with regular oil changes/cambelt done on time air filter changed etc etc etc.
Rob
All the above is true, but surely MUCH better to remove the source of the problemm, by de-activating the dreadful EGR system, which is an anachronistic work around to reduce certain residuals (mostly under artificial conditions)?

Revving the the engine balls out in a low gear for ~1km can do the engine no good at all IMHO.
R.I.P. January 2010.
XM 2.1 auto VSX 1996 - Bosch Inj, Xantia HDi 90 estate 1999, Xantia 1.9TD 1997
Previously...
GS 1970, Dyane 1974, Xantia 94 VSX TD, XM 94, 2.1 auto - Lucas Inj, XM 92 2.1 estate - Lucas Inj
User avatar
Paul-R
Donor 2023
Posts: 6946
Joined: 07 May 2009, 16:24
Location: Wirral, NW England; Vaucluse 84, France
Lexia Available: Yes
My Cars: 2015 1.6 Blue HDi 120 Peugeot 308 Active SW
2013 2.0 HDi 163 C5 Exclusive Tourer
2003 2.0 HDi 110 C5 Exclusive Estate (Gone)
2001 2.0 HDi 90 Xsara Estate (Gone)
x 1381

Post by Paul-R »

I wouldn't give a car the rev treatment for that distance either. A few hundred yards is usually all that's needed and then again if needed.
As I get older I think a lot about the hereafter - I go into a room and then wonder what I'm here after.

Inside every old person is a young person wondering what the hell happened.

"Trying is the first step towards failure" ~ Homer J Simpson​
lolingram
RIP 2010
Posts: 550
Joined: 27 Dec 2006, 07:59
Location: France
My Cars:
x 1
Contact:

Post by lolingram »

Wikipedia throws some light on the EGR:

In modern diesel engines, the EGR gas is cooled through a heat exchanger to allow the introduction of a greater mass of recirculated gas. Unlike SI engines, diesels are not limited by the need for a contiguous flamefront; furthermore, since diesels always operate with excess air, they benefit from EGR rates as high as 50% (at idle, where there is otherwise a very large amount of excess air) in controlling NOx emissions.

Since diesel engines are unthrottled, EGR does not lower throttling losses in the way that it does for SI engines (see above). However, exhaust gas (largely carbon dioxide and water vapor) has a higher specific heat than air, and so it still serves to lower peak combustion temperatures; this aids the diesel engine's efficiency by reduced heat rejection and dissociation. There are trade offs however. Adding EGR to a diesel reduces the specific heat ratio of the combustion gases in the power stroke. This reduces the amount of power that can be extracted by the piston. EGR also tends to reduce the amount of fuel burned in the power stroke. This is evident by the increase in particulate emissions that corresponds to an increase in EGR. Particulate matter (mainly carbon) that is not burned in the power stroke is wasted energy. Stricter regulations on particulate matter(PM) call for further emission controls to be introduced to compensate for the PM emissions introduced by EGR. The most common is particulate filters in the exhaust system that result in reduced fuel efficiency[citation needed]. Since EGR increases the amount of PM that must be dealt with and reduces the exhaust gas temperatures and available oxygen these filters need to function properly to burn off soot, automakers have had to consider injecting fuel and air directly into the exhaust system to keep these filters from plugging up.
R.I.P. January 2010.
XM 2.1 auto VSX 1996 - Bosch Inj, Xantia HDi 90 estate 1999, Xantia 1.9TD 1997
Previously...
GS 1970, Dyane 1974, Xantia 94 VSX TD, XM 94, 2.1 auto - Lucas Inj, XM 92 2.1 estate - Lucas Inj
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
Location: not applicable
My Cars: not applicable
x 1

Post by steelcityuk »

EGR valves do seem to attract loads of gunk don't they. I think it's down to the hot exhaust gases meeting the warm oily PCV gases.

Here's what I found on a 2.5 TD.
Image


This was the amount of gunk from one inlet port of the same engine. It didn't use any oil or smoke more than you would expect. All the inlets were exactly the same.
Image

Steve.
not applicable
MikeT
Posts: 4809
Joined: 11 Jun 2007, 16:17
Location: Christchurch, Dorset. UK
My Cars: 2005 C5restyle 1.6HDI 16v 110hp VTR Estate
2008 C5 X7 1.6HDI VTR+ Saloon
x 232

Post by MikeT »

EGR's are the work of the devil and should be abolished IMO. (Ok, I don't believe in the devil but you get the meaning)

The following pics are from my 116K 1.9TD which, I guess has been sedately used by an old couple until my ownership.

Click to enlarge
ImageImage

It's all very well giving the engine an italian de-coke (thrash) but it does increase engine wear and accelerate oil degradation while ruining the economy but having to do so even more because of this evil device is just taking the proverbial and is a poor band-aid solution which does nothing to the clear the intake restrictions caused.

Incidentally, because of the restrictions an EGR system creates, you have to use more fuel to achieve the same power output/work thus increasing pollution, not decreasing it!
lolingram
RIP 2010
Posts: 550
Joined: 27 Dec 2006, 07:59
Location: France
My Cars:
x 1
Contact:

Post by lolingram »

Incidentally, because of the restrictions an EGR system creates, you have to use more fuel to achieve the same power output/work thus increasing pollution, not decreasing it!
But of course.

Like practically all legislation of today, it is ill thought out, and without any real logic. The monkeys in Parliament (and elswhere) are utterly incompetant in the vast majority - AND many have their noses in the trough to boot.

Bloody awful...
R.I.P. January 2010.
XM 2.1 auto VSX 1996 - Bosch Inj, Xantia HDi 90 estate 1999, Xantia 1.9TD 1997
Previously...
GS 1970, Dyane 1974, Xantia 94 VSX TD, XM 94, 2.1 auto - Lucas Inj, XM 92 2.1 estate - Lucas Inj
lolingram
RIP 2010
Posts: 550
Joined: 27 Dec 2006, 07:59
Location: France
My Cars:
x 1
Contact:

Post by lolingram »

It's all very well giving the engine an italian de-coke (thrash) but it does increase engine wear and accelerate oil degradation while ruining the economy but having to do so even more because of this evil device is just taking the proverbial and is a poor band-aid solution which does nothing to the clear the intake restrictions caused.
Hard to see how a dynamic who's boss test (aka Italian decoke) could clear the intake side of things.....
R.I.P. January 2010.
XM 2.1 auto VSX 1996 - Bosch Inj, Xantia HDi 90 estate 1999, Xantia 1.9TD 1997
Previously...
GS 1970, Dyane 1974, Xantia 94 VSX TD, XM 94, 2.1 auto - Lucas Inj, XM 92 2.1 estate - Lucas Inj
Nuneatonrob
Posts: 127
Joined: 22 Jul 2008, 16:25
Location: Nuneaton
My Cars:

Post by Nuneatonrob »

Would anyone know if the EGR is fitted to the Xsara 2.0 Hdi 90 on a V plate?? I tend to drive it at it's lower end of the rev range, as I find that is where all the power is.....I have just given it a full service, including the fuel filter complete canister and it runs smoothly enough....just wondering as i want my engine to run at it's best possible for economy reasons.

I am currently getting an average of 48mpg on my varied driving down A roads and motorway and slow stop start traffic, and want it to be better.

Cheers,

Rob
'99 Xsara HDI SX 90
lolingram
RIP 2010
Posts: 550
Joined: 27 Dec 2006, 07:59
Location: France
My Cars:
x 1
Contact:

Post by lolingram »

Would anyone know if the EGR is fitted to the Xsara 2.0 Hdi 90 on a V plate?? I tend to drive it at it's lower end of the rev range, as I find that is where all the power is.....I have just given it a full service, including the fuel filter complete canister and it runs smoothly enough....just wondering as i want my engine to run at it's best possible for economy reasons.
Almost certainly... wouldn't pass the NOX [I think that's the one] test on the spec sheet otherwise.
R.I.P. January 2010.
XM 2.1 auto VSX 1996 - Bosch Inj, Xantia HDi 90 estate 1999, Xantia 1.9TD 1997
Previously...
GS 1970, Dyane 1974, Xantia 94 VSX TD, XM 94, 2.1 auto - Lucas Inj, XM 92 2.1 estate - Lucas Inj
User avatar
Paul-R
Donor 2023
Posts: 6946
Joined: 07 May 2009, 16:24
Location: Wirral, NW England; Vaucluse 84, France
Lexia Available: Yes
My Cars: 2015 1.6 Blue HDi 120 Peugeot 308 Active SW
2013 2.0 HDi 163 C5 Exclusive Tourer
2003 2.0 HDi 110 C5 Exclusive Estate (Gone)
2001 2.0 HDi 90 Xsara Estate (Gone)
x 1381

Um...

Post by Paul-R »

I don't think that an EGR operates enough (if at all) at tickover to affect the NOx output for the tailpipe test. If it did then people wouldn't be able to remove the EGR for better fuel consumption (there's a clue!) and still past the exhaust test.

BTW our Y plate Xsara 2.0 Hdi 90 definitely does have the dreaded EGR. I think they came into common usage way back in 1991/2 for diesels. My 1990 turbodiesel Montego didn't have an EGR but ones a year or two later did.
As I get older I think a lot about the hereafter - I go into a room and then wonder what I'm here after.

Inside every old person is a young person wondering what the hell happened.

"Trying is the first step towards failure" ~ Homer J Simpson​
jgra1
(Donor 2021)
Posts: 4625
Joined: 27 Nov 2005, 19:07
Location: Kent / Susssex
My Cars: 2010 C5 X7 2.0 hdi 160 exc auto
MG TF 135
Boxer II 2.2 camper conversion
BMW R1200RT
BMW K1300 R
Honda V F R 800 5thG / MT500 Armstrong
x 39

Post by jgra1 »

Sounds like an Italian Decoke to me
A Turin tune up ? :lol:

you can tell i am bored
Nuneatonrob
Posts: 127
Joined: 22 Jul 2008, 16:25
Location: Nuneaton
My Cars:

Post by Nuneatonrob »

In the xsara at least is it best to get to it from underneath does anyone know? It's a bit of a tight fit to get down behind the engine from the top...where exactly are these dreaded valves located on the HDi 90, and is it a very distinct item that is obvious?

Does it improve fuel economy with it disabled then?

Sorry for all the questions.


I think I want to intestigate and play now.

Cheers as ever,

Rob
'99 Xsara HDI SX 90
corsehf
Posts: 183
Joined: 13 Mar 2008, 07:34
Location: Worcs
My Cars:

Post by corsehf »

Similar question to Rob's really,
Where is the location of the EGR on a C5 2.2HDi and are they best disconnected ??
Andy

2003 C5 2.2HDi Exclusive SE Est

2001 C5 2.2HDi SX Est (gone to C5 Heaven!)
2001 Omega 2.2DTi Est (stolen by Ex!!)
1997 Xantia 2.1TD SX
1994 ZX TD Volcane
Lancia Stratos Replica
steelcityuk
Posts: 1053
Joined: 03 Jul 2006, 21:51
Location: not applicable
My Cars: not applicable
x 1

Post by steelcityuk »

Diesels aren't tested for NOX emissions at MOT time, just opacity (particulates). The NOX levels will be used when certifying the car for production.

If you look at this screengrab you can see the amount of EGR on a 2.0 HDi 110 at idle. Most of the EGR is done at low revs/ low load. Hence the smoke and rough idle when it goes faulty.

Image

Be careful on what engines you disconnect the EGR valve on, on some engines it's crucial that it works so as to lower the exhaust gas temperature - as owners of some Renaults found out when their engine self destructed. Disabling it should improve response and MPG though it could be very marginal.

Personally I think the Italian tune up is only good to thoroughly heat the oil and blow the gunk out the exhaust. That said on DPF cars it's needed to allow regeneration of the filter. I certainly wouldn't 'red line' any of my cars at all, I leave that to the MOT tester.

Steve.
not applicable
Post Reply