When I'm late and trying to make up time by driving more quickly, it feels like I'm putting a lot of effort into getting there quicker but never save more than a few minutes because there is so much traffic on the roads. Accelarating to your cruising speed after being held up by slower traffic burns lots of fuel!KP wrote: I guess really i am going to have bring the speed down and make more time for the trip once ive settled into it after a few days and see how it goes as i reckon it would add another 10-15minutes onto the trip which is already about 40-45mins
Xantia 1.9 TD Economy at speed
Moderator: RichardW
- Kowalski
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: 15 Oct 2003, 17:41
- Location: North East, United Kingdom
- My Cars: Ex 05 C5 2.0 HDI Exclusive 145k
Ex 97 Xantia 1.9TD SX 144k
Ex 94 Xantia Dimension 1.9TD 199k
-
- Moderating Team
- Posts: 11578
- Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 16:11
- Location: Charmouth,Dorset
- My Cars: Currently:
C5 X7 VTR + Satnav Hdi estate Silver
C5 X7 VTR + Hdi Estate 2008 Red
In the past: 3, CX td Safaris and about 7, XM td estates. Lovely cars. - x 1207
I agree with Jim (a few posts back) your driving style will have far more effect on the fuel consumption than any other single factor. The more throttle you use with a diesel the less efficient it becomes as it enriches the mixture, diesels are far more efficient at small throttle openings than petrol engines partly because of the very lean mixtures they will run on, driving at full throttle will reduce the economy to something near that of a petrol engine.
Surprisingly the 2.1 td (if you can find one) will probably have better economy than the 1.9, partly because you have more power and therefore can use less throttle,and also because they are a very efficient engine. I have run 2.1 td XMs for more than 10 years and on a longish journey driven sensibly they will exceed 50 mpg, my wifes 1.9 td ZX will only do about 45 mpg on the same sort of journey.
Surprisingly the 2.1 td (if you can find one) will probably have better economy than the 1.9, partly because you have more power and therefore can use less throttle,and also because they are a very efficient engine. I have run 2.1 td XMs for more than 10 years and on a longish journey driven sensibly they will exceed 50 mpg, my wifes 1.9 td ZX will only do about 45 mpg on the same sort of journey.
- steviewonder7
- Posts: 226
- Joined: 08 May 2005, 01:02
- Location: United Kingdom,5 min from the seaside
- My Cars:
- x 2
-
- Moderating Team
- Posts: 11578
- Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 16:11
- Location: Charmouth,Dorset
- My Cars: Currently:
C5 X7 VTR + Satnav Hdi estate Silver
C5 X7 VTR + Hdi Estate 2008 Red
In the past: 3, CX td Safaris and about 7, XM td estates. Lovely cars. - x 1207
Its quite possible to run an internal combustion on 'water gas' hydrogen + oxygen, in fact it will run very efficiently on it, the problem is that it takes more energy to extract the gasses from the water than they produce when burned, school physics demonstrates that. Unless someone has found a way of reversing the 'laws of physics.
- steviewonder7
- Posts: 226
- Joined: 08 May 2005, 01:02
- Location: United Kingdom,5 min from the seaside
- My Cars:
- x 2
So has anyone on this site contemplated having a go at this hydrogen fuel.
The site links shows that you can even buy kits for various sized petrol/diesel engines and more.
The site links shows that you can even buy kits for various sized petrol/diesel engines and more.
1994 Xantia 1.9TD sx non anti sink.No aircon.Gone to the great scappy up above.
Now with Xsara Picasso 2.0 HDI (90 bhp)(03 plate) in 'Wicked Red'
Now with Xsara Picasso 2.0 HDI (90 bhp)(03 plate) in 'Wicked Red'
The problem with batteries - besides their cost and sheer weight - is that they take time to charge - whereas your home hydrogen electrolysis kit could be happily gassing away producing the stuff while you are cursing the sun or wind in your car - you then transfer the gas when you get home or buy it elsewhere if you're caught short.
Home produced hydrogen has potential for some awful accidents.
Home produced hydrogen has potential for some awful accidents.
jeremy