Xsara HDi 110 fuel consumption

This is the Forum for all your Citroen Technical Questions, Problems or Advice.

Moderator: RichardW

Post Reply
nick
Posts: 1079
Joined: 14 Mar 2001, 01:49
Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire
My Cars:

Xsara HDi 110 fuel consumption

Post by nick »

Hi everyone,
I've just recently bought a Xsara HDi to replace the Xantia TD Ive had for the past 6 years. Generally I'm very pleased with the Xsara so far, but the only problem is the fuel consumption. I expected a Xsara HDi, considering its a slightly smaller, lighter car with a DI engine, to be noticeably more economical than the IDI Xantia 1.9TD, but so far there doesn't seem to be that much difference between them :(

Eg;
Around town: Xantia 39-41 mpg, Xsara 40 mpg
Mixed: Xantia 43-45 mpg, Xsara 47 mpg
Constant-ish 65-70mph: Xantia 48-51mpg, Xsara 50mpg
Thrashed!: Xantia 39 mpg, Xsara 39 mpg

Perhaps I'm not comparing like with like - the Xantia figures are measured from fill-up to fill-up, the Xsara's are from its onboard fuel computer which may or may not be accurate. To be fair, the Xantia figures do also seem better than many normally get from a 1.9TD.

Today I've replaced the air filter on the Xsara, though the one I took out wasn't especially dirty, and put some "Diesel Magic" in the fuel to see if that improves matters. The man I bought the Xsara off reckoned he never usually got much more than 40 mpg.

So do I have a particularly economical Xantia 1.9TD, or a not very economical Xsara HDi here ?!
bencowell
Posts: 507
Joined: 20 Oct 2002, 13:47
Location:
My Cars:
x 1

Post by bencowell »

Sounds like it needs a trip to an independent.

My C5 HDI gets 45mpg most of the time, even with quite a lot of urban.

Also, the computers lie!
User avatar
AndersDK
Posts: 6060
Joined: 21 Feb 2003, 04:56
Location: Denmark
My Cars:
x 1

Post by AndersDK »

The 19TD is a very economical engine - one of the best IDI diesels ever made in that aspect.
Still it only produces a fraction under 90Bhp.

Your HDI 110 produces 110Bhp (hence the designation). You wont get the extra 20Bhp for free - even with a DI diesel.

I'd say you get good mileage for your fuel money - nothing to worry about.
Note that you may think you are VERY lightfooted on your right - but still there are many drivers even more lightfooted than you are :wink:
Mileage is more the result of drive style - than technical issues - believe me :idea:
Anders (DK) - '90 BX16Image
Peter.N.
Moderating Team
Posts: 11563
Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 16:11
Location: Charmouth,Dorset
My Cars: Currently:

C5 X7 VTR + Satnav Hdi estate Silver
C5 X7 VTR + Hdi Estate 2008 Red

In the past: 3, CX td Safaris and about 7, XM td estates. Lovely cars.
x 1199

Post by Peter.N. »

Unfortunatly modern common rail engines rely primarily on the computer to control the engine, so the economy is not so 'under your control' as it is with the old mechanically controlled pumps. A modern engine can appear to be running OK but you dont really know without checking the information that the computer is sending to the injectors and only your dealer can do this. Thats one reason that I am hanging on to my XM as long as possible! :x
nick
Posts: 1079
Joined: 14 Mar 2001, 01:49
Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire
My Cars:

Post by nick »

Thanks for the advice chaps, hopefully I was panicking unnecessarily - I've just filled it up & calculated from the actual mileage. Its come out at 52, whereas computer says 42 :)
I haven't been able to fill up at the same pump twice yet, so this may still not be very accurate, but I hope its just a case of the computer lying.
nick
Posts: 1079
Joined: 14 Mar 2001, 01:49
Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire
My Cars:

Post by nick »

Just a quick update, after a few more fill ups the average fuel consumption on shortish journeys around town is about 48-51 mpg, which is nice! The computer meanwhile says its averaging 36-37 :lol:

The fuel computer fault I can live with, but what is more strange is the fuel gauge - it just keeps dropping. With each fill up it gets lower & lower and is now showing just under half full. Thats with a completely full tank!
I've heard this is a common fault with the Xsara, is there any known cure for this?
jeremy
Posts: 3959
Joined: 20 Oct 2002, 16:00
Location: Hampshire, UK
My Cars:
x 2

Post by jeremy »

Yes - fit a ZX fuel level unit - mine reads empty and is flashing the light with about 3.5 gallons left! - measured by filling the tank - no computer to mislead!
jeremy
nick
Posts: 1079
Joined: 14 Mar 2001, 01:49
Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire
My Cars:

Post by nick »

Good idea! I think the fuel level sensor/gauge it currently has must have come from a V8 Range Rover.....
JohnD
(Donor 2022)
Posts: 2632
Joined: 14 Mar 2001, 23:41
Location: Epsom, Surrey
My Cars: 2010 Citroen C5-X7 tourer
1998 Citroen Saxo 1.5D
2018 Citroen C4-B7
1998 Peugeot 306. 1.9D
2011 Citroen C1
x 72
Contact:

Post by JohnD »

Within the last year I've changed from a Xantia 2.1 to a C5 estate. Using GPS on journeys such as Calais to Malaga, I realised the Xantia was reading 5% high on both mileage distance and speed. Therefore my average consumption was more like 40mpg rather than the 42 figure obtained by dividing miles covered by gallons used. The mileometer on the C5 is accurate compared with GPS and the fuel computer agrees almost spot on with miles divided by gallons.
2010 C5 X7 VTR+Nav 160
1998 1.5 Saxo
1998 Pug 306 1.9D
2018 C4 B7 VTR+
2011 Citroen C1
nick
Posts: 1079
Joined: 14 Mar 2001, 01:49
Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire
My Cars:

Post by nick »

JohnD wrote: The mileometer on the C5 is accurate compared with GPS and the fuel computer agrees almost spot on with miles divided by gallons.
My dad has also found the computer on his C5 HDi to be very accurate, Xsaras on the other hand seem to be way off the mark. A "friend of a friend" has an '01 Xsara almost identical to mine and says the mpg per the computer is usually at least 10 mpg lower than the real figure.
den169
Posts: 262
Joined: 30 Jul 2002, 20:51
Location: Bradford
My Cars:

Post by den169 »

Did 1800 miles to france and back last month and the c5 computer was spot on.
Homer
Posts: 1503
Joined: 26 Feb 2003, 10:52
Location: Yorkshire
My Cars: Current:
Volvo V60 D4 180

Previous:
BX16RS (two of),
BX19TZI,
Xantia 2.0i saloon,
Xantia 2.0 Exclusive CT turbo Break,
Peugeot 807 2.0 HDi 110,
Renault Grand Scenic, 2.0 diesel (150bhp)
C5 X7 2.0 HDi 160 which put me off French cars possibly forever
x 16

Post by Homer »

The computer in our 807 is spot on, I won't tell you what it does though, far too scary.
bencowell
Posts: 507
Joined: 20 Oct 2002, 13:47
Location:
My Cars:
x 1

Post by bencowell »

My C5 2.0 HDI 110 computer used to be 3 to 4 mpg lower all the time.

Since passing 60k miles, it has been spot on. Economy isn't improving though!
Post Reply