XUD vs HDi

This is the place for posts that don't fit into any other category.

Moderator: RichardW

User avatar
uhn113x
Posts: 1161
Joined: 06 Jan 2004, 23:06
x 1

Post by uhn113x » 14 Sep 2004, 14:01

Windoze 2000 and XP pro are very stable (speaking as a professional software developer)
You need to get rid of the Windows for Teletubbies appearance on the latter, though.

Thunderbird

Post by Thunderbird » 24 May 2005, 22:38

Why wasn't this topic locked?
Edit. <b><i>You "dug it up" from ages ago, what job do you do? Gravedigger?</i></b> [:(!]

turbolag
Posts: 143
Joined: 23 Dec 2004, 20:03

Post by turbolag » 25 May 2005, 00:42

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by broomie</i>

HDi = no or less head gasket problems/ How so ? I am intrigued!
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Lower HDi compression ratio is the main contributory factor.
A good decat, filter and remap will have a swift, frugal and relaiable 140-150bhp, which was far beyond sensible XUD tuning limits.